|
Post by saskabronco on Jun 25, 2015 1:19:17 GMT -5
I can't add another option it won't let me. So I will try and add more info. This is a true story so its easy to answer your questions. There were a few other customers there. All white. The employees were white. The employee that was "checking the Black woman" out kind of followed her after that. Fixing stuff on the shelves. The black lady picked out a tank top, and bought it. And left. Then given that the employee saw the black lady in the store and decided to follow her around, but no one else (assuming that there is no history between the two or with the black woman and the store) then I think it is very fair to say the employee racially profiled the black woman. From your description, the black woman did nothing else suspicious to warrant being followed and monitored more closely than any other customer and the only distinguishing feature about her seems to be the colour of her skin, unless there is more information you have still not given us. So based on all of the information we have now, yes this is a case of racial profiling.
|
|
|
Post by saskabronco on Jun 25, 2015 2:02:23 GMT -5
Spoiler of the story: The woman was actually white, so now we're all racist.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2015 2:08:41 GMT -5
Spoiler of the story: The woman was actually white, so now we're all racist. Well you are. More of a race baiter. Not only that you are not trustworthy. I sent you the punch line in private and said I didn't want to say it yet. But you had to do this. I'll tell the story tomorrow. I'm going to bed.
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Jun 25, 2015 2:09:55 GMT -5
Spoiler of the story: The woman was actually white, so now we're all racist. Well we are obviously racist, I think that's pretty clear.
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Jun 25, 2015 2:13:34 GMT -5
Spoiler of the story: The woman was actually white, so now we're all racist. Well you are. More of a race baiter. Not only that you are not trustworthy. I sent you the punch line in private and said I didn't want to say it yet. But you had to do this. I'll tell the story tomorrow. I'm going to bed. Except that you told us the woman was black, and gave no other indication that she was doing anything suspicious, and was being profiled in some way shape or form, and the only information that you gave us she was black. If anything you were race bating. You used this story and only gave information that could lead to the conclusion that she was being judged because she was black. Had you said she was dressed lesser, or was acting suspiciously than it gives us other routes to make, but with the information you provided you gave us one assumption to make. That my friend is race bating at its finest, well done.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2015 2:14:49 GMT -5
Spoiler of the story: The woman was actually white, so now we're all racist. Well we are obviously racist, I think that's pretty clear. Your feeding the fire. Not you Jin but your brother. And don't trust him with a PM. He ruined my study. Now its not worth trying to explain my point. I think it went over his head.
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Jun 25, 2015 2:19:38 GMT -5
Well we are obviously racist, I think that's pretty clear. Your feeding the fire. Not you Jin but your brother. And don't trust him with a PM. He ruined my study. Now its not worth trying to explain my point. I think it went over his head. Lol, your study is entirely flawed as I said in my last response. You gave no other information that would lead to any other conclusion. Let me try this. There is an all white church, and a black guy walks into said church and starts screaming "DIE WHITIES DIE!" Is it racist?
|
|
|
Post by saskabronco on Jun 25, 2015 2:21:02 GMT -5
Spoiler of the story: The woman was actually white, so now we're all racist. Well you are. More of a race baiter. Not only that you are not trustworthy. I sent you the punch line in private and said I didn't want to say it yet. But you had to do this. I'll tell the story tomorrow. I'm going to bed. I told the spoiler because you are baiting people into something. You are lying to them about something and setting them up so that the situation clearly seems purely based on race. If it was one white woman in a room with all black women, it would also seem racist. When race is the only distinguishable feature, the obvious link is to some sort of racism. But instead you want to lie to everyone then call us all racist when you break the news that now there must be some other distinguishable feature. Obviously the lady chose to target the lady in your story for some reason. Maybe it was her hair or how she was dressed, but either way there is still some distinguishable feature that attracted the employee to follow the woman. You were being dishonest about the information, and now we are back to not having enough. I don't really care if you think I'm trustworthy or not. You've just been accusing me of being a race baiter and of hating white Americans all night. Life lesson: don't act like a dick to someone then expect them to respect your secret attempt to try and act like a dick to more people. Instead: grow up.
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Jun 25, 2015 2:21:47 GMT -5
Oh as it turns out the black guy is actually a white guy... But from reading the first part of that without reading this, you can draw literally no other conclusion than that the black guy is racist. And that sir is what you did.
|
|
|
Post by saskabronco on Jun 25, 2015 2:22:46 GMT -5
Your feeding the fire. Not you Jin but your brother. And don't trust him with a PM. He ruined my study. Now its not worth trying to explain my point. I think it went over his head. Lol, your study is entirely flawed as I said in my last response. You gave no other information that would lead to any other conclusion. Let me try this. There is an all white church, and a black guy walks into said church and starts screaming "DIE WHITIES DIE!" Is it racist? Spoiler: They are actually all ducks. Now anyone who said yes clearly hates ducks...
|
|