|
Post by plax on Dec 19, 2013 16:50:24 GMT -5
T'Munga is the best.
|
|
|
Post by EagleDomiKnation on Dec 19, 2013 17:49:35 GMT -5
MAtt Asiata
|
|
|
Post by cityofchamps on Dec 19, 2013 18:10:18 GMT -5
Best all around All-Time? Gotta be Marshall Faulk. No question.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2013 22:21:36 GMT -5
Ok I let the replies build up a little...But according to my research best all around RB has M Faulk number one and LT number two. Both are top 10 all time leading rushers,both caught helluva lot of passes and both were excellent blockers.
|
|
|
Post by DPNormanReturns on Dec 20, 2013 7:59:27 GMT -5
If he didn't suck at catching, I might say Alfred Morris. I think it definitely comes down to Peterson (healthy) narrowly beating Charles.
Edit: I didn't realize Charles was a good blocker, too. Maybe Charles has a shot to be better. I'd be happy with either one.
|
|
|
Post by EagleDomiKnation on Dec 20, 2013 18:25:01 GMT -5
If he didn't suck at catching, I might say Alfred Morris. I think it definitely comes down to Peterson (healthy) narrowly beating Charles. Edit: I didn't realize Charles was a good blocker, too. Maybe Charles has a shot to be better. I'd be happy with either one. Shady more complete than Charles.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Dec 20, 2013 18:27:10 GMT -5
If he didn't suck at catching, I might say Alfred Morris. I think it definitely comes down to Peterson (healthy) narrowly beating Charles. Edit: I didn't realize Charles was a good blocker, too. Maybe Charles has a shot to be better. I'd be happy with either one. Shady more complete than Charles. Coin toss if you want to agree to disagree. Charles is statistically a better blocker, maybe a shade less of a runner, and as good or better receiver. I'm not even sure he's not as good as a runner, or a better receiver.
|
|
|
Post by EagleDomiKnation on Dec 20, 2013 18:35:40 GMT -5
Shady more complete than Charles. Coin toss if you want to agree to disagree. Charles is statistically a better blocker, maybe a shade less of a runner, and as good or better receiver. I'm not even sure he's not as good as a runner, or a better receiver. Charles is a bit faster. Making blocking a stat? Dunno. I've never seen Shady puss out on blocks and makes em all as far as I've seen. As far as vision and running/cutting/juking ability...Shady takes the cake. Both almost never fumble. Shady also catches with the best of em. We're both blessed with great rbs. And both of us will homer it out on this discussion. As I always bitch about....I should have said 'in my opinion'.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Dec 20, 2013 18:38:05 GMT -5
Coin toss if you want to agree to disagree. Charles is statistically a better blocker, maybe a shade less of a runner, and as good or better receiver. I'm not even sure he's not as good as a runner, or a better receiver. Charles is a bit faster. Making blocking a stat? Dunno. I've never seen Shady puss out on blocks and makes em all as far as I've seen. As far as vision and running/cutting/juking ability...Shady takes the cake. Both almost never fumble. Shady also catches with the best of em. We're both blessed with great rbs. And both of us will homer it out on this discussion. As I always bitch about....I should have said 'in my opinion'. Touche then. I will reply with 'In my Opinion' as well.
|
|
|
Post by Divebitch on Dec 20, 2013 18:59:26 GMT -5
Shady more complete than Charles. Coin toss if you want to agree to disagree. Charles is statistically a better blocker, maybe a shade less of a runner, and as good or better receiver. I'm not even sure he's not as good as a runner, or a better receiver. nflfanforums.proboards.com/thread/3304/who-best-all-rb?page=4Chrissakes, he's not a better receiver, McCoy by a landslide, IDK why people would think that cuz he had the greatest game of his life. I have no idea about Charles being the better blocker. I have doubts about where that came from and based on what, but fine. I know fisthand McCoy is very good at that as well, I see that all the time. Shady is more complete IMO, Charles faster. Shady is just as 'shady'. But I'll concede as someone mentioned (eagledomk, that was you, right?) that he is slower - he has burst but can be caught. CJ could blow the doors off him in that dept.
|
|