|
|
Post by Morkim on Oct 24, 2014 12:24:12 GMT -5
I think he meant edelman. Compare edelman / Welker the last two seasons. You think no such thing, neither does anyone with a brain. Pats didn't say 'have', he said 'got' - the GOT Amendola. As in 'gotten at the same time'. Cheaper as in '6 vs. 5.7 mil. Slot receiver, as in duh...'Amendola'. Juggs, I wrote this before you even posted, so we and everyone else here (but 2) are on the same page. lol Busy watching NASCAR practice. You're basing it entirely on grammar? Edelman is a cheaper option than welker, and he filled welkers role. The patriots may have brought Dola on for that role, but it's not as if the patriots don't have a slot receiver performing better than Welker. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2014 13:07:50 GMT -5
I'm over my rant now. My awesome aunt passed away right after the game and facebook is full of loving posts and pictures from all my cousins. I'm very sad but happy she is no longer in pain. Sure put things in perspective for me today. RIP auntie Eileen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jancey on Oct 24, 2014 14:03:31 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure he meant Edelman...like 90%
|
|
|
|
Post by Divebitch on Oct 24, 2014 14:18:03 GMT -5
You think no such thing, neither does anyone with a brain. Pats didn't say 'have', he said 'got' - the GOT Amendola. As in 'gotten at the same time'. Cheaper as in '6 vs. 5.7 mil. Slot receiver, as in duh...'Amendola'. Juggs, I wrote this before you even posted, so we and everyone else here (but 2) are on the same page. lol Busy watching NASCAR practice. You're basing it entirely on grammar? Edelman is a cheaper option than welker, and he filled welkers role. The patriots may have brought Dola on for that role, but it's not as if the patriots don't have a slot receiver performing better than Welker. Grammar?!? OMG, I AM SURE YOU READ JUGG's post. "Nah, he meant Danny. The Pats didn't "get" edelman. They've had him for years. Comparing him to Welker would insane. Not that that stopped the Ammendola comparison of course." EDIT: I'm pretty sure he meant Edelman...like 90% Okay, this is beyond sick already, I'm about to give up too. Just wow. Jancey, I never thought you. lol |
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Oct 24, 2014 14:29:11 GMT -5
You're basing it entirely on grammar? Edelman is a cheaper option than welker, and he filled welkers role. The patriots may have brought Dola on for that role, but it's not as if the patriots don't have a slot receiver performing better than Welker. Grammar?!? OMG, I AM SURE YOU READ JUGG's post. "Nah, he meant Danny. The Pats didn't "get" edelman. They've had him for years. Comparing him to Welker would insane. Not that that stopped the Ammendola comparison of course." EDIT: I'm pretty sure he meant Edelman...like 90% Okay, this is beyond sick already, I'm about to give up too. Just wow. Jancey, I never thought you. lol I don't know why you're getting so irritated about this. Grammar, yes. The difference between using "got" and "have". Feels like you're basing the whole point on that. Juggs too for what it's worth. I'm simply disagreeing with your assumption. I saw Juggs post. I replied to it. Did you want to answer what I asked him? I'll even quote what I said to make it easier. |
|
|
|
Post by Divebitch on Oct 24, 2014 15:36:28 GMT -5
The difference between 'got' and 'have', particularly in this instance is far more than grammatical. Most people understand it intuitively, as is evidenced by it being addressed before me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Oct 24, 2014 15:39:29 GMT -5
The difference between 'got' and 'have', particularly in this instance is far more than grammatical. Most people understand it intuitively, as is evidenced by it being addressed before me. You drew a conclusion based on a single word he used. I drew a different conclusion. Only difference is I didn't say you only have half a brain for disagreeing with me. Why is it crazy to compare Edelman and Welker? Don't they both play the same role in the patriots offense? |
|
|
|
Post by plax on Oct 24, 2014 15:43:37 GMT -5
Has Edelman done better than Welker? Stats-wise, yes.
But Amendola was Welker's replacement (seeing as how Amendola was signed right after Welker), and Amendola has been a bust in New England.
In terms of productivity? Edelman > Welker > Amendola.
But Edelman is Brady's top WR target, and Welker is 4th behind The 2 Thomas' and Sanders, so I would hope Edelman has been outplaying Welker in the box score.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Oct 24, 2014 15:46:07 GMT -5
Has Edelman done better than Welker? Stats-wise, yes. But Amendola was Welker's replacement (seeing as how Amendola was signed right after Welker), and Amendola has been a bust in New England. In terms of productivity? Edelman > Welker > Amendola. But Edelman is Brady's top WR target, and Welker is 4th behind The 2 Thomas' and Sanders, so I would hope Edelman has been outplaying Welker in the box score. Hah, c'mon. Doesn't matter when Dola was signed. Edelman -has- replaced Welker. He took over Welkers role in the offense. |
|
|
|
Post by Divebitch on Oct 24, 2014 16:12:29 GMT -5
You drew a conclusion based on a single word he used. I drew a different conclusion. Only difference is I didn't say you only have half a brain for disagreeing with me. What was this single word?!? And never said ANYTHING about half a brain. You did. So...the word??? |
|
