craig440
College Starter
My dog
Posts: 547
|
Post by craig440 on Oct 7, 2015 18:48:34 GMT -5
Oh thanks. I do understand why he is upset. It was a parley, and I understand that. You have to get them all right or you're out. So he lost totally.
I've done three team parleys, but never six like that. That would have been a big win me tinks.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Oct 7, 2015 19:09:58 GMT -5
craig440, I'm sure tonodank will get back with you on what his card, but since I'm here.. He bet on the Falcons to cover the 6.5 point spread, which they did. He bet on ATL/HOU to combined for more than 46.5 points; they did. He bet on OAK/CHI to combine for more than 44.5 points; they didn't. Browns to cover the 7.5 point spread; they did. Vikes to cover the 6.5 point spread; they did. Rams to cover the 6.5 point spread; they did as well. And for some reason that I'm not sure of, he's disappointed that only one didn't pan out. Maybe if he got them all correct, he'd win some kind of bonus cash? I dunno. It wasn't six separate bets. lol Like Craig said. parley means you have to get them -all- right. That sort of risk usually carries a big pay day...
|
|
|
Post by Jancey on Oct 7, 2015 19:27:49 GMT -5
craig440, I'm sure tonodank will get back with you on what his card, but since I'm here.. He bet on the Falcons to cover the 6.5 point spread, which they did. He bet on ATL/HOU to combined for more than 46.5 points; they did. He bet on OAK/CHI to combine for more than 44.5 points; they didn't. Browns to cover the 7.5 point spread; they did. Vikes to cover the 6.5 point spread; they did. Rams to cover the 6.5 point spread; they did as well. And for some reason that I'm not sure of, he's disappointed that only one didn't pan out. Maybe if he got them all correct, he'd win some kind of bonus cash? I dunno. It wasn't six separate bets. lol Like Craig said. parley means you have to get them -all- right. That sort of risk usually carries a big pay day... Ah, well I didn't know what a parley was. Man, how much did you miss out on TonOdanK? Or is asking just adding salt to the wound?
|
|
|
Post by TonOdanK on Oct 7, 2015 23:18:18 GMT -5
It wasn't six separate bets. lol Like Craig said. parley means you have to get them -all- right. That sort of risk usually carries a big pay day... Ah, well I didn't know what a parley was. Man, how much did you miss out on TonOdanK? Or is asking just adding salt to the wound? $1,000. Some casinos have better odds than others, the one I bet at paid 50-1. I know $1,000 isn't really that much money but what bothers me the most is that I was a FG away from winning. Week 2 I only got 2 right and week 3 I got 4 and I didn't really care
|
|
|
Post by mitch9234 on Oct 29, 2015 10:37:40 GMT -5
I hate the so called right wingers of my country.
I needed to vent off here because I know you guys are smart and aren't stupid like the people I'll mention in this rant or the ones I usually find debating about this issue around the internet.
On this last weekend, there was a test applied on the whole country on Saturday on Sunday, both tests with different subjects. On the subject about human science, there was a question including a quote about Simone de Beauvoir ("One is not born a woman, but becomes one."), a feminist and you had to interpret the quote and mark the correct answer. The people of the right, including federal and state deputies, with no correlation to the elaboration of the test and no intelligence either, said that the question had the intention to doctrinate our people into idiots and that it was a communist plot!
On Sunday, the theme for an essay, who always aboards social problems, was about the persistence of violence against women. The whining from the aforementioned groups for the same aforementioned reason had only increased. They even asked "if no one is born a woman, then why violence against woman exists?"
There's the right wingers of Brazil.
/rant
|
|
|
Post by MarchingOn on Oct 29, 2015 12:15:40 GMT -5
I hate the so called right wingers of my country. I needed to vent off here because I know you guys are smart and aren't stupid like the people I'll mention in this rant or the ones I usually find debating about this issue around the internet. On this last weekend, there was a test applied on the whole country on Saturday on Sunday, both tests with different subjects. On the subject about human science, there was a question including a quote about Simone de Beauvoir ("One is not born a woman, but becomes one."), a feminist and you had to interpret the quote and mark the correct answer. The people of the right, including federal and state deputies, with no correlation to the elaboration of the test and no intelligence either, said that the question had the intention to doctrinate our people into idiots and that it was a communist plot! On Sunday, the theme for an essay, who always aboards social problems, was about the persistence of violence against women. The whining from the aforementioned groups for the same aforementioned reason had only increased. They even asked "if no one is born a woman, then why violence against woman exists?" There's the right wingers of Brazil. /rant They aren't any better over here in the states.
|
|
|
Post by mitch9234 on Oct 29, 2015 13:55:13 GMT -5
I hate the so called right wingers of my country. I needed to vent off here because I know you guys are smart and aren't stupid like the people I'll mention in this rant or the ones I usually find debating about this issue around the internet. On this last weekend, there was a test applied on the whole country on Saturday on Sunday, both tests with different subjects. On the subject about human science, there was a question including a quote about Simone de Beauvoir ("One is not born a woman, but becomes one."), a feminist and you had to interpret the quote and mark the correct answer. The people of the right, including federal and state deputies, with no correlation to the elaboration of the test and no intelligence either, said that the question had the intention to doctrinate our people into idiots and that it was a communist plot! On Sunday, the theme for an essay, who always aboards social problems, was about the persistence of violence against women. The whining from the aforementioned groups for the same aforementioned reason had only increased. They even asked "if no one is born a woman, then why violence against woman exists?" There's the right wingers of Brazil. /rant They aren't any better over here in the states. Doesn't that suck?
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Oct 29, 2015 16:15:23 GMT -5
I hate the so called right wingers of my country. I needed to vent off here because I know you guys are smart and aren't stupid like the people I'll mention in this rant or the ones I usually find debating about this issue around the internet. On this last weekend, there was a test applied on the whole country on Saturday on Sunday, both tests with different subjects. On the subject about human science, there was a question including a quote about Simone de Beauvoir ("One is not born a woman, but becomes one."), a feminist and you had to interpret the quote and mark the correct answer. The people of the right, including federal and state deputies, with no correlation to the elaboration of the test and no intelligence either, said that the question had the intention to doctrinate our people into idiots and that it was a communist plot! On Sunday, the theme for an essay, who always aboards social problems, was about the persistence of violence against women. The whining from the aforementioned groups for the same aforementioned reason had only increased. They even asked "if no one is born a woman, then why violence against woman exists?" There's the right wingers of Brazil. /rant They aren't any better over here in the states. Same in Canada.. I will say though, I don't like the generalization of "right wingers" all being this way. What we often see of a group is the vocal minority, and for what ever reason the vocal minority is often the loudest dumbest people around. There are many intelligent right wingers, just as there are many idiot left wingers, but we don't see them the same way. We tend to not see the stupidity of the side we lean towards because we at least somewhat agree with what they say, where as the stupidity of the people we disagree with is magnified 10 fold because its obvious how much we disagree.
|
|
|
Post by mitch9234 on Oct 29, 2015 16:34:37 GMT -5
They aren't any better over here in the states. Same in Canada.. I will say though, I don't like the generalization of "right wingers" all being this way. What we often see of a group is the vocal minority, and for what ever reason the vocal minority is often the loudest dumbest people around. There are many intelligent right wingers, just as there are many idiot left wingers, but we don't see them the same way. We tend to not see the stupidity of the side we lean towards because we at least somewhat agree with what they say, where as the stupidity of the people we disagree with is magnified 10 fold because its obvious how much we disagree. In my original post I generalized them, that wasn't my intention, I know they aren't all like that. My bad. They're so hard to find that I forgot about them.
|
|
|
Post by TonOdanK on Nov 8, 2015 0:27:07 GMT -5
Finally won my first parlay of the year. I only won a $100 bucks but at least I won back my money that I've been betting[/p]
|
|