|
|
Post by saskabronco on Feb 19, 2016 22:48:19 GMT -5
The fact that you liken this story to Winston, Kobe and Lewis just shows how absurd you are being. Manning allegedly pulled down his pants in the face of a trainer. He didn't rape or murder anyone. On another note, how about that Super Bowl victory? It's great to see our team work so hard and have our defence come up big game after game all season. Even though some fans claimed we had no chance (on paper) we still beat the best (or second best) in order to take home the championship. Gooooo Broncos! Except for the fact that I didn't compare the stories at all and your fellow Peyton supporter was the one who compared them. Manning allegedly put his genitals on the face of the trainer, that is sexual assault and is a big deal. And no one is downplaying your superbowl victory, but no one is going to ignore this Peyton story either because it is a huge deal. You claimed earlier that Manning should never have played a down in the NFL. What he did was stupid and immature and deserved punishment (if he actually did it) but the punishment should not be banishment from the entire NFL. Maybe you were just trolling when you said that, but the problem with you is that it's impossible to tell the difference. At least with Morkim I know he's just pissing around trying to have fun with everything. You just come across as an arrogant moron. And I just wanted to mention the victory because all that has been talked about in this Denver Broncos Super Bowl Champion thread is a bunch of bullshit from sore losers who can't handle a team they hate winning the Super Bowl. You should be used to that.. It happens whenever your team wins too... I'm just taking an opportunity to talk about something positive for the Broncos fans here. |
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 19, 2016 22:53:46 GMT -5
Except for the fact that I didn't compare the stories at all and your fellow Peyton supporter was the one who compared them. Manning allegedly put his genitals on the face of the trainer, that is sexual assault and is a big deal. And no one is downplaying your superbowl victory, but no one is going to ignore this Peyton story either because it is a huge deal. You claimed earlier that Manning should never have played a down in the NFL. What he did was stupid and immature and deserved punishment (if he actually did it) but the punishment should not be banishment from the entire NFL. Maybe you were just trolling when you said that, but the problem with you is that it's impossible to tell the difference. At least with Morkim I know he's just pissing around trying to have fun with everything. You just come across as an arrogant moron. And I just wanted to mention the victory because all that has been talked about in this Denver Broncos Super Bowl Champion thread is a bunch of bullshit from sore losers who can't handle a team they hate winning the Super Bowl. You should be used to that.. It happens whenever your team wins too... I'm just taking an opportunity to talk about something positive for the Broncos fans here. How can I have fun when discussing sexual harassment? You can't put your balls on someone's face. Canadians, I tell you... |
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Feb 19, 2016 23:34:29 GMT -5
Except for the fact that I didn't compare the stories at all and your fellow Peyton supporter was the one who compared them. Manning allegedly put his genitals on the face of the trainer, that is sexual assault and is a big deal. And no one is downplaying your superbowl victory, but no one is going to ignore this Peyton story either because it is a huge deal. You claimed earlier that Manning should never have played a down in the NFL. What he did was stupid and immature and deserved punishment (if he actually did it) but the punishment should not be banishment from the entire NFL. Maybe you were just trolling when you said that, but the problem with you is that it's impossible to tell the difference. At least with Morkim I know he's just pissing around trying to have fun with everything. You just come across as an arrogant moron. And I just wanted to mention the victory because all that has been talked about in this Denver Broncos Super Bowl Champion thread is a bunch of bullshit from sore losers who can't handle a team they hate winning the Super Bowl. You should be used to that.. It happens whenever your team wins too... I'm just taking an opportunity to talk about something positive for the Broncos fans here. If he put his genitals in the trainers face, then it wasn't some stupid immature thing, it was disgusting and jail worthy, and no I don't want anyone who does something like that in the NFL. That incident alone is a really big deal, but too me the bigger thing is the accusations of how Peyton went after her character after the fact. I think I have kept a pretty consistent standpoint when it comes to sexual assault, and that doesn't always mean rape. Those guilty of those type of crimes do not deserve to play in the NFL. No what Peyton is accused of doing does not fall under the same standards as Ben, but it doesn't mean that it isn't a big deal either. And believe it or not I am happy for you, Denver's defensive victory was very impressive and deserves plenty of acknowledgement. No its not fair to fans that some scandal is discussed more than the victory, but this shouldn't be downplayed either. |
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Feb 19, 2016 23:35:27 GMT -5
Except for the fact that I didn't compare the stories at all and your fellow Peyton supporter was the one who compared them. Manning allegedly put his genitals on the face of the trainer, that is sexual assault and is a big deal. And no one is downplaying your superbowl victory, but no one is going to ignore this Peyton story either because it is a huge deal. I'll downplay their super bowl victory. saskabronco They cheated and the refs were in their pocket.  I will be raising funds for Ted Wells to investigate. |
|
|
|
Post by coltsrockjcr on Feb 20, 2016 1:58:37 GMT -5
You can't possibly take King seriously. He's a f-ing joke. 1. He claims he is black, while by all accounts he is white. 2. One of the leaders of BLM, until he was excommunicated for 'mismanaging' the funds he raised 3. Lied about getting beat up by a mob of a white kids claiming racism, when all witnesses say he was beat up by one kid for yelling and getting aggressive with the guy's girlfriend over a broken cd. He has been the ultimate race-baiter his entire life, and the only reason he ever wrote that joke of an article was because he thought it was racist that Cam was being criticized for his on-field antics and actions after the SB. He dug up a settled non story from 20 years ago as it was the only possible dirt he could throw on Manning's legacy. Not to mention, NYDN is a failing tabloid desperate for readers and internet traffic, explaining their employment of such a dishonest, controversial fraud. Funny how you try so hard to discredit a perfectly credible writer and then use Jason Whitlock as positive example. Whitlock has done nothing to prove his credibility in this case and has a history of sexual misconduct claims from previous coworkers and was fired by ESPN for other matters. The fact that the majority of King's work has to do with race has absolutely nothing to do with this article. He did not "dig up" a "non story" from 20 years ago, he did release the 74 page report that has never been available before. You need to stop trying to discredit reporting and look at the actual facts. You have an incredible amount of bias both as a Colts fan and of the University of Tennessee. Lmao you're the one telling me to look at the facts. Get your head out of your ass man. It's laughable that you claim that King is credible in any way. King's article had everything to do with race, and he was not the first to publish the "report." 1. It's not a report, it is Naughright's lawyers' listing of allegations against UT, Peyton, and the management. So obviously pretty biased. 2. USA Today published the document 13 years ago, and it caught fire with the media. This case has been revisited again and again, and Manning's story has never changed. Naughright's has multiple times. You clearly have no knowledge of the situation and are too hateful and full of bias to examine this case rationally. I have posted the actual events of this whole saga in my own words and in articles, and you have yet to make a valid point. If you're trolling then good job man, you got me, but if not you look like a dumbass. One last piece for your careful examination. www.lewrockwell.com/2016/02/william-l-anderson/peyton-manning-white-privilege/ |
|
|
|
Post by saskabronco on Feb 20, 2016 17:15:26 GMT -5
This topic is getting really old really fast. Here is the main, underlying fact of the matter: None of us know what actually happened. There are conflicting reports coming from various directions. Maybe you think Naughright was coerced into withholding certain information in her original statement, maybe you think he changed her story later on to get money from Manning. You can choose to believe either one but none of us knows what actually happened.
If Manning actually teabagged Naughright, that is bad. At first I didn't think it was sexual assault, but I was wrong. Sexual assault refers to sexual touching, or touching of sexual parts without consent. I read in one report that an Alabama student got two years in prison for tea bagging a passed out girl at a party. But there is no proof that he did that. All we have is a statement by Naughright made 7 years after the incident that contradicts her original statement.
There is one serious problem here that needs addressing though. If people can get over this Manning incident, because no actual proof will ever come of this (it's literally just her word against his), then they can focus on the fact that UT has a horrendous reputation of rape culture. Women have been treated horribly there for a long time. There are currently 6 women claiming to have been raped by UT athletes (Not Manning, unfortunately for Patskid). Their organization has a history of fostering a very harmful, mysogenistic culture where women are treated horribly. And it's not just UT. The amount of professional athletes that get away with horrific actions because they are rich and famous is absurd.
I'm not saying that I think Manning is definitely innocent. I honestly don't know the truth and neither does anyone here... It's no surprise that Patskid and Mork jump all over this, because they hate Manning and want to see his name dragged through the mud any chance they get. By the same token, Coltsrock shows an extreme bias the other way, trying to show that Manning is innocent and shaming Naughright to remove her credibility. So guys, rather that trying to act like you're having a real, intellectual discussion about this topic just say what you actually mean:
Patskid: I hate Manning!
Morkim: I also hate Manning!
Coltsrock: Well I love Manning!
Patskid: Yeah, well I super duper hate Manning!
Coltsrock: I love him like a brother!
Morkim: Manning sux!
Despite all the words you guys use, that's all you're really saying.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 20, 2016 19:28:31 GMT -5
This topic is getting really old really fast. Here is the main, underlying fact of the matter: None of us know what actually happened. There are conflicting reports coming from various directions. Maybe you think Naughright was coerced into withholding certain information in her original statement, maybe you think he changed her story later on to get money from Manning. You can choose to believe either one but none of us knows what actually happened. If Manning actually teabagged Naughright, that is bad. At first I didn't think it was sexual assault, but I was wrong. Sexual assault refers to sexual touching, or touching of sexual parts without consent. I read in one report that an Alabama student got two years in prison for tea bagging a passed out girl at a party. But there is no proof that he did that. All we have is a statement by Naughright made 7 years after the incident that contradicts her original statement. There is one serious problem here that needs addressing though. If people can get over this Manning incident, because no actual proof will ever come of this (it's literally just her word against his), then they can focus on the fact that UT has a horrendous reputation of rape culture. Women have been treated horribly there for a long time. There are currently 6 women claiming to have been raped by UT athletes (Not Manning, unfortunately for Patskid). Their organization has a history of fostering a very harmful, mysogenistic culture where women are treated horribly. And it's not just UT. The amount of professional athletes that get away with horrific actions because they are rich and famous is absurd. I'm not saying that I think Manning is definitely innocent. I honestly don't know the truth and neither does anyone here... It's no surprise that Patskid and Mork jump all over this, because they hate Manning and want to see his name dragged through the mud any chance they get. By the same token, Coltsrock shows an extreme bias the other way, trying to show that Manning is innocent and shaming Naughright to remove her credibility. So guys, rather that trying to act like you're having a real, intellectual discussion about this topic just say what you actually mean: Patskid: I hate Manning! Morkim: I also hate Manning! Coltsrock: Well I love Manning! Patskid: Yeah, well I super duper hate Manning! Coltsrock: I love him like a brother! Morkim: Manning sux! Despite all the words you guys use, that's all you're really saying. but... Manning does sux. |
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Feb 20, 2016 20:22:49 GMT -5
This topic is getting really old really fast. Here is the main, underlying fact of the matter: None of us know what actually happened. There are conflicting reports coming from various directions. Maybe you think Naughright was coerced into withholding certain information in her original statement, maybe you think he changed her story later on to get money from Manning. You can choose to believe either one but none of us knows what actually happened. If Manning actually teabagged Naughright, that is bad. At first I didn't think it was sexual assault, but I was wrong. Sexual assault refers to sexual touching, or touching of sexual parts without consent. I read in one report that an Alabama student got two years in prison for tea bagging a passed out girl at a party. But there is no proof that he did that. All we have is a statement by Naughright made 7 years after the incident that contradicts her original statement. There is one serious problem here that needs addressing though. If people can get over this Manning incident, because no actual proof will ever come of this (it's literally just her word against his), then they can focus on the fact that UT has a horrendous reputation of rape culture. Women have been treated horribly there for a long time. There are currently 6 women claiming to have been raped by UT athletes (Not Manning, unfortunately for Patskid). Their organization has a history of fostering a very harmful, mysogenistic culture where women are treated horribly. And it's not just UT. The amount of professional athletes that get away with horrific actions because they are rich and famous is absurd. I'm not saying that I think Manning is definitely innocent. I honestly don't know the truth and neither does anyone here... It's no surprise that Patskid and Mork jump all over this, because they hate Manning and want to see his name dragged through the mud any chance they get. By the same token, Coltsrock shows an extreme bias the other way, trying to show that Manning is innocent and shaming Naughright to remove her credibility. So guys, rather that trying to act like you're having a real, intellectual discussion about this topic just say what you actually mean: Patskid: I hate Manning! Morkim: I also hate Manning! Coltsrock: Well I love Manning! Patskid: Yeah, well I super duper hate Manning! Coltsrock: I love him like a brother! Morkim: Manning sux! Despite all the words you guys use, that's all you're really saying. Hmm informed on what sexual assault is. Didn't realize this before. |
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 20, 2016 21:01:48 GMT -5
This topic is getting really old really fast. Here is the main, underlying fact of the matter: None of us know what actually happened. There are conflicting reports coming from various directions. Maybe you think Naughright was coerced into withholding certain information in her original statement, maybe you think he changed her story later on to get money from Manning. You can choose to believe either one but none of us knows what actually happened. If Manning actually teabagged Naughright, that is bad. At first I didn't think it was sexual assault, but I was wrong. Sexual assault refers to sexual touching, or touching of sexual parts without consent. I read in one report that an Alabama student got two years in prison for tea bagging a passed out girl at a party. But there is no proof that he did that. All we have is a statement by Naughright made 7 years after the incident that contradicts her original statement. There is one serious problem here that needs addressing though. If people can get over this Manning incident, because no actual proof will ever come of this (it's literally just her word against his), then they can focus on the fact that UT has a horrendous reputation of rape culture. Women have been treated horribly there for a long time. There are currently 6 women claiming to have been raped by UT athletes (Not Manning, unfortunately for Patskid). Their organization has a history of fostering a very harmful, mysogenistic culture where women are treated horribly. And it's not just UT. The amount of professional athletes that get away with horrific actions because they are rich and famous is absurd. I'm not saying that I think Manning is definitely innocent. I honestly don't know the truth and neither does anyone here... It's no surprise that Patskid and Mork jump all over this, because they hate Manning and want to see his name dragged through the mud any chance they get. By the same token, Coltsrock shows an extreme bias the other way, trying to show that Manning is innocent and shaming Naughright to remove her credibility. So guys, rather that trying to act like you're having a real, intellectual discussion about this topic just say what you actually mean: Patskid: I hate Manning! Morkim: I also hate Manning! Coltsrock: Well I love Manning! Patskid: Yeah, well I super duper hate Manning! Coltsrock: I love him like a brother! Morkim: Manning sux! Despite all the words you guys use, that's all you're really saying. Hmm informed on what sexual assault is. Didn't realize this before. One of the girls on Pop trigger the YouTube show had a creepy neighbor flash her and touch himself in front of her. Pressed charges for sexual harassment/assault I think. |
|
|
|
Post by whysoserious on Feb 22, 2016 13:50:32 GMT -5
This was deserving of a thread? With Payton Manthing in the title?
He did nothing to win a superbowl. Skip Bayless could have qb that team. Gimme a break.
Fixed.
|
|
