|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Feb 17, 2016 12:33:49 GMT -5
Peter King is the biggest idiot in sports journalism. A simple search will bear that out. Wait... Wasn't he the one who recanted the Al Jazeerer story about Peyton & HGH? Ya know he recently came out and basically said it was all true, worded in a way he couldn't be sued. It's amazing he still has a job. BTW, that was a pure judgement call. It happened faster than the human eye could see. And he only hoped a teammate would get it - anyone could have. What about the holding non-call? The only thing anyone could see is that King's a Broncos hater. EDIT: Oh!! Oh!! The best part... he called Von Miller a Cornerback - twice! mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/02/14/von-miller-denver-broncos-super-bowl-mvp--nflAfter watching the play 6 times, super-slowmo probably, he comes up with "Miller, from behind the play, tries to go for it too, but Newton is in his way. Miller, again with his long left arm, reaches down and in the one millisecond the ball lies free, swipes it backward toward the Carolina goal line. You can barely see him do it; it’s almost like a sleight-of-hand trick by a magician." Give me a F#&%*# break. This article is pretty funny... deadspin.com/the-problem-with-peter-king-1638536051Peter King is consistently a Peyton supporter, clearly in bed with Archie's money. lol I can't even count how many times you called Malcolm Butler a safety after the superbowl. Difference is you actually thought he was a safety. Miller cheated, Peyton cheated, and Peyton should be in jail. Broncos still lead the NFL in cheating. |
|
|
|
Post by Divebitch on Feb 17, 2016 16:24:22 GMT -5
Peter King is the biggest idiot in sports journalism. A simple search will bear that out. Wait... Wasn't he the one who recanted the Al Jazeerer story about Peyton & HGH? Ya know he recently came out and basically said it was all true, worded in a way he couldn't be sued. It's amazing he still has a job. BTW, that was a pure judgement call. It happened faster than the human eye could see. And he only hoped a teammate would get it - anyone could have. What about the holding non-call? The only thing anyone could see is that King's a Broncos hater. EDIT: Oh!! Oh!! The best part... he called Von Miller a Cornerback - twice! mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/02/14/von-miller-denver-broncos-super-bowl-mvp--nflAfter watching the play 6 times, super-slowmo probably, he comes up with "Miller, from behind the play, tries to go for it too, but Newton is in his way. Miller, again with his long left arm, reaches down and in the one millisecond the ball lies free, swipes it backward toward the Carolina goal line. You can barely see him do it; it’s almost like a sleight-of-hand trick by a magician." Give me a F#&%*# break. This article is pretty funny... deadspin.com/the-problem-with-peter-king-1638536051Peter King is consistently a Peyton supporter, clearly in bed with Archie's money. lol I can't even count how many times you called Malcolm Butler a safety after the superbowl. Difference is you actually thought he was a safety. Miller cheated, Peyton cheated, and Peyton should be in jail. Broncos still lead the NFL in cheating. IDK why you'd outright lie about something easily confirmed. Many times? Show me one. IDT I ever thought he was a safety, that's the only reason I looked it up. Never gave a thought to what he was really, who gives a crap anyway? Just that he was a nobody in the right place at the right time. Even Morkim understands that much. Not meant as a slight to him at all, might sound that way. lol IDK if that search will work, but I did put my name in, and it brought up only my posts. Miller cheated  |
|
|
|
Post by coltsrockjcr on Feb 17, 2016 18:27:59 GMT -5
This whole Peyton controversy should be a non-story www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/on-peyton-manning-and-dumb-people-online-021616CLIFFS 19 year old kid did a stupid prank In original report to UT authorities, the "victim" never mentioned physical contact, only that she saw his exposed ass She claimed that she made physical contact with Manning 7 years after the fact, when her lawsuit was about to be put down before reaching trial From the article, since I'm too lazy to paraphrase: "If Manning isn't facing her and drops his pants, wouldn't she, since she's working on his foot, have seen his pants around his ankles? I don't know about you, but when I drop my pants or shorts they end up around my ankles. She says she noticed his actions because she heard "laughter and looked up to see his exposed rear end" from others in the training room, not because his pants appeared around his ankles. That means Manning didn't even drop his pants, he just pulled them down. Which is, you know, exactly what you do when you moon someone. You just pull down your pants in the back. It also makes it harder to see how Manning's scrotal region could ever come in contact with her -- as she has claimed since 2003 -- unless he has superhuman clinching ability, it's hard to see how Manning could keep his pants from falling down once his pants and underwear passed his ass." |
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Feb 17, 2016 21:01:38 GMT -5
This whole Peyton controversy should be a non-story www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/on-peyton-manning-and-dumb-people-online-021616CLIFFS 19 year old kid did a stupid prank In original report to UT authorities, the "victim" never mentioned physical contact, only that she saw his exposed ass She claimed that she made physical contact with Manning 7 years after the fact, when her lawsuit was about to be put down before reaching trial From the article, since I'm too lazy to paraphrase: "If Manning isn't facing her and drops his pants, wouldn't she, since she's working on his foot, have seen his pants around his ankles? I don't know about you, but when I drop my pants or shorts they end up around my ankles. She says she noticed his actions because she heard "laughter and looked up to see his exposed rear end" from others in the training room, not because his pants appeared around his ankles. That means Manning didn't even drop his pants, he just pulled them down. Which is, you know, exactly what you do when you moon someone. You just pull down your pants in the back. It also makes it harder to see how Manning's scrotal region could ever come in contact with her -- as she has claimed since 2003 -- unless he has superhuman clinching ability, it's hard to see how Manning could keep his pants from falling down once his pants and underwear passed his ass." Only people who think this is a non story are UT or Peyton fans, you are both. |
|
|
|
Post by coltsrockjcr on Feb 17, 2016 22:06:21 GMT -5
This whole Peyton controversy should be a non-story www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/on-peyton-manning-and-dumb-people-online-021616CLIFFS 19 year old kid did a stupid prank In original report to UT authorities, the "victim" never mentioned physical contact, only that she saw his exposed ass She claimed that she made physical contact with Manning 7 years after the fact, when her lawsuit was about to be put down before reaching trial From the article, since I'm too lazy to paraphrase: "If Manning isn't facing her and drops his pants, wouldn't she, since she's working on his foot, have seen his pants around his ankles? I don't know about you, but when I drop my pants or shorts they end up around my ankles. She says she noticed his actions because she heard "laughter and looked up to see his exposed rear end" from others in the training room, not because his pants appeared around his ankles. That means Manning didn't even drop his pants, he just pulled them down. Which is, you know, exactly what you do when you moon someone. You just pull down your pants in the back. It also makes it harder to see how Manning's scrotal region could ever come in contact with her -- as she has claimed since 2003 -- unless he has superhuman clinching ability, it's hard to see how Manning could keep his pants from falling down once his pants and underwear passed his ass." Only people who think this is a non story are UT or Peyton fans, you are both. That's just not true. Anyone that actually looks into a case examining all aspects instead of reading headlines and blindly buying into the BS spat out by phony/blatantly biased journalists such as Shaun King would conclude that this case is settled and has been overblown, exaggerated, and straight up lied about by mass media and click-bait journalists. For example, Jason Whitlock, long-time Peyton basher like yourself, perhaps has been Manning's fiercest defender concerning this case. But ignore the facts. |
|
inoccent
NFL Starter
Die Hard Lions Fan or Idiot #1 if you prefer
Posts: 1,750
|
Post by inoccent on Feb 17, 2016 22:17:13 GMT -5
This whole Peyton controversy should be a non-story www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/on-peyton-manning-and-dumb-people-online-021616CLIFFS 19 year old kid did a stupid prank In original report to UT authorities, the "victim" never mentioned physical contact, only that she saw his exposed ass She claimed that she made physical contact with Manning 7 years after the fact, when her lawsuit was about to be put down before reaching trial From the article, since I'm too lazy to paraphrase: "If Manning isn't facing her and drops his pants, wouldn't she, since she's working on his foot, have seen his pants around his ankles? I don't know about you, but when I drop my pants or shorts they end up around my ankles. She says she noticed his actions because she heard "laughter and looked up to see his exposed rear end" from others in the training room, not because his pants appeared around his ankles. That means Manning didn't even drop his pants, he just pulled them down. Which is, you know, exactly what you do when you moon someone. You just pull down your pants in the back. It also makes it harder to see how Manning's scrotal region could ever come in contact with her -- as she has claimed since 2003 -- unless he has superhuman clinching ability, it's hard to see how Manning could keep his pants from falling down once his pants and underwear passed his ass." Only people who think this is a non story are UT or Peyton fans, you are both. I'm neither and think this is a nonstory. Jesus I could be raking in the dough if I sued everyone who has ever mooned me. I'd lose all that money as soon as they sued me for mooning them. |
|
inoccent
NFL Starter
Die Hard Lions Fan or Idiot #1 if you prefer
Posts: 1,750
|
Post by inoccent on Feb 17, 2016 22:20:21 GMT -5
Only people who think this is a non story are UT or Peyton fans, you are both. That's just not true. Anyone that actually looks into a case examining all aspects instead of reading headlines and blindly buying into the BS spat out by phony/blatantly biased journalists such as Shaun King would conclude that this case is settled and has been overblown, exaggerated, and straight up lied about by mass media and click-bait journalists. For example, Jason Whitlock, long-time Peyton basher like yourself, perhaps has been Manning's fiercest defender concerning this case. But ignore the facts. Patskid ignoring facts when they aren't in his favor? Well I'll be a monkey's uncle. |
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 17, 2016 22:24:04 GMT -5
Only people who think this is a non story are UT or Peyton fans, you are both. I'm neither and think this is a nonstory. Jesus I could be raking in the dough if I sued everyone who has ever mooned me. I'd lose all that money as soon as they sued me for mooning them. If this story happened to a heisman runner up in today's college football there would be all sorts of scandal about this sort of sexual harassment. It's only a non story because it happened in the 90s. |
|
|
|
Post by steelersfan4life56 on Feb 17, 2016 22:34:46 GMT -5
Only people who think this is a non story are UT or Peyton fans, you are both. I'm neither and think this is a nonstory. Jesus I could be raking in the dough if I sued everyone who has ever mooned me. I'd lose all that money as soon as they sued me for mooning them. He didn’t moon her. He put his testicles on her face. |
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Feb 17, 2016 22:36:17 GMT -5
This whole Peyton controversy should be a non-story www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/on-peyton-manning-and-dumb-people-online-021616CLIFFS 19 year old kid did a stupid prank In original report to UT authorities, the "victim" never mentioned physical contact, only that she saw his exposed ass She claimed that she made physical contact with Manning 7 years after the fact, when her lawsuit was about to be put down before reaching trial From the article, since I'm too lazy to paraphrase: "If Manning isn't facing her and drops his pants, wouldn't she, since she's working on his foot, have seen his pants around his ankles? I don't know about you, but when I drop my pants or shorts they end up around my ankles. She says she noticed his actions because she heard "laughter and looked up to see his exposed rear end" from others in the training room, not because his pants appeared around his ankles. That means Manning didn't even drop his pants, he just pulled them down. Which is, you know, exactly what you do when you moon someone. You just pull down your pants in the back. It also makes it harder to see how Manning's scrotal region could ever come in contact with her -- as she has claimed since 2003 -- unless he has superhuman clinching ability, it's hard to see how Manning could keep his pants from falling down once his pants and underwear passed his ass." Only people who think this is a non story are UT or Peyton fans, you are both. Wrong. I cheer against Manning against pretty much everyone but the Jets, Patriots and Cowboys. I am not a Volunteer either, I am pretty much oblivious to them. I find this a total non story. He mooned a girl when he was 19.. big whoop! I've mooned people, I've been mooned numerous times, most people I know have been mooned. It's a harmless prank... people should get over it. |
|
