|
Post by plax on Jan 17, 2014 19:23:52 GMT -5
jancey isn't in this, so not sure why you are asking him about a CAP loan lol === I love my Giants team. I got James Anderson for cheap, and he is a very good LB I got Beason for ONLY 3mil I got Peppers and K. Williams for 6 mil COMBINED I got Fred Davis and Jermichael Finley for the MIN! I got Boldin for less than 4 mil! I actually have an OL now, with good backups. I got a top 10 CB for 6mil. I got Rolle back for only 5mil. He was 2nd team All-Pro this year. I released Snee, Baas, and Rolle to save 20+mil in CAP I got them all back for less than 8. Who da man!? lol Wow.... Had no idea we could do that. I would've resigned Jabari Greer in a heartbeat if I knew that was legal. jeez, some of you guys....
|
|
|
Post by MarchingOn on Jan 17, 2014 19:26:57 GMT -5
Wow.... Had no idea we could do that. I would've resigned Jabari Greer in a heartbeat if I knew that was legal. jeez, some of you guys.... ...Well.. You were all about saying you wanted this to mirror real life, and I don't think a player would accept being released only to be signed back for a much worse deal (money wise) by the same team. I just assumed.
|
|
|
Post by plax on Jan 17, 2014 19:30:42 GMT -5
jeez, some of you guys.... ...Well.. You were all about saying you wanted this to mirror real life, and I don't think a player would accept being released only to be signed back for a much worse deal (money wise) by the same team. I just assumed. well, for one: www.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2014/01/why_it_makes_sense_for_the_jets_to_release_and_re-sign_antonio_cromartie.htmland it isn't the players decision with being on the team. it is the FOs decision. if they want to release a player, the player can do nothing about it. and you act like they wanted to make less. on Snee and Baas, no one even put out a BID for them. so what, they gonna decline and sit on the couch? And with Rolle, we was BID on, and I had the highest bid. none of you are making any sense with your reasoning.
|
|
|
Post by MarchingOn on Jan 17, 2014 19:35:05 GMT -5
...Well.. You were all about saying you wanted this to mirror real life, and I don't think a player would accept being released only to be signed back for a much worse deal (money wise) by the same team. I just assumed. well, for one: www.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2014/01/why_it_makes_sense_for_the_jets_to_release_and_re-sign_antonio_cromartie.htmland it isn't the players decision with being on the team. it is the FOs decision. if they want to release a player, the player can do nothing about it. and you act like they wanted to make less. on Snee and Baas, no one even put out a BID for them. so what, they gonna decline and sit on the couch? And with Rolle, we was BID on, and I had the highest bid. none of you are making any sense with your reasoning. No, I get that. But I don't think 4.5 Mil for a 3 year deal is a league standard either. (correct me if I'm wrong tho) But what if a player didn't get a deal? Do you think they would turn down less than 4.5 for a three year deal? I don't. For some reason that was a requirement in this thing though.
|
|
|
Post by plax on Jan 17, 2014 19:39:43 GMT -5
No, I get that. But I don't think 4.5 Mil for a 3 year deal is a league standard either. (correct me if I'm wrong tho) But what if a player didn't get a deal? Do you think they would turn down less than 4.5 for a three year deal? I don't. For some reason that was a requirement in this thing though. I did the yearly wage thing so we don't get 7yr deals for 13mil that someone tried to do. I knew for a FACT that people were gonna offer 4+yr deals as LOW as possible. This isn't Madden. And the reason for the numbers of the yearly thing is that why would a player want to be locked into a 3yr deal making almost nothing. That makes no sense. Would a young player who is getting better want to be locked into a 4yr deal for 5mil? I have no clue why you suddenly switched the conversation from releasing and re-signing to yearly wage values. It seems this was on your mind, and if it was, you should have brought it it to me earlier. And to answer your question about turning down a 3yr deal for less than 4.5mil, they would rather take 1yr for the same amount.
|
|
|
Post by plax on Jan 17, 2014 19:41:27 GMT -5
No, I get that. But I don't think 4.5 Mil for a 3 year deal is a league standard either. (correct me if I'm wrong tho) But what if a player didn't get a deal? Do you think they would turn down less than 4.5 for a three year deal? I don't. For some reason that was a requirement in this thing though. and show me how many players take deals of 4 or more years who take less than 2mil a year?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2014 19:46:25 GMT -5
St. Louis Rams Empire
|
|
|
Post by MarchingOn on Jan 17, 2014 19:56:24 GMT -5
No, I get that. But I don't think 4.5 Mil for a 3 year deal is a league standard either. (correct me if I'm wrong tho) But what if a player didn't get a deal? Do you think they would turn down less than 4.5 for a three year deal? I don't. For some reason that was a requirement in this thing though. I did the yearly wage thing so we don't get 7yr deals for 13mil that someone tried to do. I knew for a FACT that people were gonna offer 4+yr deals as LOW as possible. This isn't Madden. And the reason for the numbers of the yearly thing is that why would a player want to be locked into a 3yr deal making almost nothing. That makes no sense. Would a young player who is getting better want to be locked into a 4yr deal for 5mil? I have no clue why you suddenly switched the conversation from releasing and re-signing to yearly wage values. It seems this was on your mind, and if it was, you should have brought it it to me earlier. And to answer your question about turning down a 3yr deal for less than 4.5mil, they would rather take 1yr for the same amount. True. But at the very least, there shouldn't be any more of those requirements for the next WW since FA is over. If a player gets claimed off the next waiver wire, that's likely the only deal they'd get so they would accept it whatever the deal is. I'm not really switching the subject as much as I am just raising a point. Like Juggs said though, it's not a big deal. I can still resign Greer, so there's nothing to worry about.
|
|
|
Post by plax on Jan 17, 2014 20:01:43 GMT -5
I did the yearly wage thing so we don't get 7yr deals for 13mil that someone tried to do. I knew for a FACT that people were gonna offer 4+yr deals as LOW as possible. This isn't Madden. And the reason for the numbers of the yearly thing is that why would a player want to be locked into a 3yr deal making almost nothing. That makes no sense. Would a young player who is getting better want to be locked into a 4yr deal for 5mil? I have no clue why you suddenly switched the conversation from releasing and re-signing to yearly wage values. It seems this was on your mind, and if it was, you should have brought it it to me earlier. And to answer your question about turning down a 3yr deal for less than 4.5mil, they would rather take 1yr for the same amount. True. But at the very least, there shouldn't be any more of those requirements for the next WW since FA is over. If a player gets claimed off the next waiver wire, that's likely the only deal they'd get so they would accept it whatever the deal is. there WERE no requirements for the first WW, so no clue what you are talking about. Unless you mean paying their base salary, which is an actual rule in the NFL.
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Jan 17, 2014 20:06:37 GMT -5
MarchingOn what if I want to offer Jabari Greer a little more money than you do?
|
|