|
Post by EagleDomiKnation on Mar 26, 2013 15:28:44 GMT -5
Ran a better 40..all ive heard.
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Mar 26, 2013 21:00:15 GMT -5
yep shed over a second and landed a 4.71 best. I guess thats where the line is because a 4.8 is laughed at and a 4.7 is good.
|
|
|
Post by Jancey on Mar 26, 2013 21:21:54 GMT -5
I read that he bumped it up to a 4.75 from a 4.82...but that's an unofficial time...so it was most likely about the same time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2013 21:29:33 GMT -5
I saw a thing on TV. The slowest forty times for linebackers in resent years was Larry English 7.88, then Brian Cushing. I think Cushing is pretty good ball player right?
|
|
|
Post by EagleDomiKnation on Mar 26, 2013 22:38:10 GMT -5
7.88 craig?? Typo i hope.
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Mar 27, 2013 8:23:03 GMT -5
I read that he bumped it up to a 4.75 from a 4.82...but that's an unofficial time...so it was most likely about the same time. he ran a 4.75 and a 4.71
|
|
|
Post by EagleDomiKnation on Mar 27, 2013 10:40:10 GMT -5
Nfl reports official 4.71
Said his overall workout was much better. Still say hes a 2nd rounder at best.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2013 11:38:42 GMT -5
7.88 craig?? Typo i hope. No not a typo, I think it was ESPN. Showed the three slowest Lb times. Larry English was slowest 4.88. Then Cushings and I forget the third.
|
|
|
Post by EagleDomiKnation on Mar 27, 2013 11:45:23 GMT -5
But in your first post you wrote. 7.88. Thats what I meant. Think you meant to write 4.88
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2013 11:52:02 GMT -5
But in your first post you wrote. 7.88. Thats what I meant. Think you meant to write 4.88 oh okay. haha thanks for catching that, YES that was a typo.
|
|