|
Post by coltsrockjcr on Jan 2, 2013 20:50:02 GMT -5
Where is Warmack? And Dion Jordan? Didn't catch that. Thought I had Jordan in somewhere. Will be fixed.
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Jan 2, 2013 20:52:46 GMT -5
BTW I like the mock too. Only other problems I see is Eifert is a little bit to high and I don't think the Packers go TE. Only other thing is Banks is a little bit too high IMO.
|
|
|
Post by coltsrockjcr on Jan 2, 2013 21:01:23 GMT -5
The Raiders only traded up 2 picks. The trade was: KC gets: 1.3 and 4th round pick; OAK gets: 1.1 Last year the Redskins traded up 4 spots for RG3... IMO Teo is on around the same talent level as RG3. They gave up 4 first round picks. I think we could get a second. But that was based on pure need and the skill of RG3. He is just not a player you pass up on. Plus he's a QB, therefore worth more than most other positions. This class is also nowhere as good as last year's.
|
|
|
Post by coltsrockjcr on Jan 2, 2013 21:03:53 GMT -5
BTW I like the mock too. Only other problems I see is Eifert is a little bit to high and I don't think the Packers go TE. Only other thing is Banks is a little bit too high IMO. Thanks! I think they will need a TE more than anything for the Packers since Finley is gone. They have Crabtree who is a good backup, but not a starter. There is plenty of talent in later rounds for defense
|
|
|
Post by plax on Jan 2, 2013 21:25:42 GMT -5
Hm, Giants get Jordan. I can definitely see it as Osi is as good as gone. I am hoping for Warmack (and I HATE picking lineman as they are not exciting).
I would LOVE Warmack or Matthews in the 1st, and Logan Ryan or Khaseem Greene in the 2nd.
Giants gotta stock on D and OL this draft and FA. They are still contenders, but can elevate their status with good pickups.
|
|
|
Post by coltsrockjcr on Jan 2, 2013 22:04:24 GMT -5
I think there is much talent at OG outside the 1st round. Notice I didn't have Jonathan Cooper going in the 1st
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Jan 2, 2013 23:08:05 GMT -5
I don't entirely understand why the raiders trade up to get T'eo... I don't believe anyone will trade up to #1 or #2 to get T'eo.. MLB generally won't go that early. Who else would trade up to get T'eo at the #1 and 2 spots? and who is willing to pay the hefty sum it would cost to move up to those positions just for a ILB?? If the Raiders stay where they are they will likely get Manti T'eo if they want him. And if someone is willing to give away a shit load of picks to move up to #1 or #2 to pick T'eo over the Raiders.. Then the Raiders can sit happy with Star Lotulelei, who fills IMO an even bigger need.
I hope I haven't offended you but the trade doesn't make any sense to me. More likely is that Arizona trades up for Joekel because he won't be there at 7.
|
|
|
Post by Panther on Jan 2, 2013 23:14:55 GMT -5
Not a big fan of Hankins, but probably the right position.
Whichever of these three positions is the BPA should be our first round pick... OT, DT, WR
|
|
|
Post by lostabroad2 on Jan 3, 2013 1:54:43 GMT -5
I agree with jindred. It's a terrible trade at the top. I've seen nothing to suggest that the Chiefs or the Jaguars will pick T'eo. Will the Lions or someone else move up to #2 to get him ahead of the Raiders? That would be possible, but if the Jaguars didn't want him they would likely prefer to trade down to #3 with the Raiders and still get the player they want. They could also trade back further if someone else wanted the #3 pick. I don't know if the Chiefs want Smith but if they do they won't allow the Jaguars the opportunity to pick him. If someone trades for the #1 pick it'll be the Jaguars or the Cardinals.
|
|
nflfootball11
College Starter
Three Great WRs! Woods, Goodwin and Rogers!
Posts: 538
|
Post by nflfootball11 on Jan 3, 2013 8:56:08 GMT -5
I like Buffalo's move, trading down for help at DE and getting a big reciever out of it. And I don't think Raiders would be able to trade up. If another team that picks higher than Oakland wants the pick Oakland would have to give so much more than Washington did for RG3.
|
|