|
Post by Morkim on Sept 19, 2014 13:01:36 GMT -5
Shoulda started Hester.
|
|
|
Post by gobolts25 on Sept 19, 2014 15:36:01 GMT -5
Sanders. I don't trust Welker this week to make an impact, and Sherman is going to be on Dthomas, leaving Sanders one-on-one with Maxwell. That's not a bad matchup, Maxwell's still above average especially with great safety play, but I think the bad matchup doesn't lower Sanders enough to the point where you don't play him. Why wouldn't you think Decker would make an impact? It's not like he's coming off an injury or something, and I'm sure Manning still remembers how to throw to him.
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Sept 19, 2014 16:29:03 GMT -5
Sanders. I don't trust Welker this week to make an impact, and Sherman is going to be on Dthomas, leaving Sanders one-on-one with Maxwell. That's not a bad matchup, Maxwell's still above average especially with great safety play, but I think the bad matchup doesn't lower Sanders enough to the point where you don't play him. Why wouldn't you think Decker would make an impact? It's not like he's coming off an injury or something, and I'm sure Manning still remembers how to throw to him. What are you talking about? Decker is injured and he doesn't play for Denver anymore.
|
|
|
Post by gobolts25 on Sept 19, 2014 16:56:46 GMT -5
Why wouldn't you think Decker would make an impact? It's not like he's coming off an injury or something, and I'm sure Manning still remembers how to throw to him. What are you talking about? Decker is injured and he doesn't play for Denver anymore. Sorry, brainfart...Welker.
|
|
Miss Lacy
NFL Draft pick
Professor
In the book of life, the answers aren't in the back.
Posts: 1,242
|
Post by Miss Lacy on Sept 19, 2014 17:20:33 GMT -5
Sanders. I don't trust Welker this week to make an impact, and Sherman is going to be on Dthomas, leaving Sanders one-on-one with Maxwell. That's not a bad matchup, Maxwell's still above average especially with great safety play, but I think the bad matchup doesn't lower Sanders enough to the point where you don't play him. GB put Boykin on Sherman's side of the field-- and Rodgers didn't look at him once--but he hit Randall Cobb several times. Although operating an offense on half a field didn't work out so well for my beloved Pack and their MVP QB in the end. SD took a different approach and-- quite frankly-- out-coached the SEA D over the middle with Gates. I think Peyton Manning spent a long while in the film room this week-- watching Phillip Rivers torch that vaulted "League of Boom". You don't think-- Manning doesn't still think about that SB loss? Given the particular motivation and focus of this how many times MVP QB, would you bet against their four receiving threats (The Thomas boys, Sanders and Welker--and oh, Ball at the 5th) keeping the SEA D very very busy-- ala Phillip Rivers-- all game? Julius Thomas will probably benefit the most-- but Sanders has the best shot at having a better matchup with the least-talented, but still-stout, Seattle's nickel defense. Jimmy Graham might be the hot-loving mistress, but Brees knows he needs to regularly satisfy Marcus Colston in his fickle offense attack, if NO is gonna win games. Cooks has shown some pre-and-early season moves, but we're in the regular season now-- and a now-heathly Kenny Stills earned his standing above the rookie in this way-deep WR corp pecking order. That's why I'm still for neither. If you start Cooks, you better pray he capitalizes on his three targets -- versus Sanders seven.
|
|