|
Post by Juggs on Dec 31, 2013 18:27:21 GMT -5
HAHAHAHAHAH NO VERNER FOR YOU LEL Next time you want to open your mouth, just stop.
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Dec 31, 2013 18:28:24 GMT -5
So what are the rules for the "plax tag"? All three have different rules The numbers you used are (roughly) the non-exclusive tag, the transition tag #'s are lower, and the exclusive tag values are way too high. So does that mean these tags follow the NE tag rules? If that's the case, teams can still negotiate with Graham, but if they sign him, they owe two first round picks.
|
|
|
Post by plax on Dec 31, 2013 18:30:30 GMT -5
So what are the rules for the "plax tag"? All three have different rules The numbers you used are (roughly) the non-exclusive tag, the transition tag #'s are lower, and the exclusive tag values are way too high. So does that mean these tags follow the NE tag rules? If that's the case, teams can still negotiate with Graham, but if they sign him, they owe two first round picks. you can place a player under it, and they are on your roster for the year. contract is fully guaranteed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2013 18:31:34 GMT -5
HAHAHAHAHAH NO VERNER FOR YOU LEL Next time you want to open your mouth, just stop. Tennessee Titans === $14,484,393Goodluck franchise tagging Verner and then signing your rookies! $3,224,393 is not enough cash to sign all your rookies
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Dec 31, 2013 18:32:24 GMT -5
So what are the rules for the "plax tag"? All three have different rules The numbers you used are (roughly) the non-exclusive tag, the transition tag #'s are lower, and the exclusive tag values are way too high. So does that mean these tags follow the NE tag rules? If that's the case, teams can still negotiate with Graham, but if they sign him, they owe two first round picks. you can place a player under it, and they are on your roster for the year. contract is fully guaranteed. There's no negotitaion? sweet. That's my best case scenario. It makes no sense, but I'm game. Guarantees me Verner at the lowest possible price. Hey Beast. Suck it.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Dec 31, 2013 18:35:13 GMT -5
I demand Graham get a WR tag.
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Dec 31, 2013 18:36:32 GMT -5
I demand Graham get a WR tag. Precedent: Jared Cook was required a TE tag because he got a majority of snaps in the slot, away from the line. If that is Graham's situation, he should be given the WR tag. "NFLPA sources said such an argument would take into account the role Graham played in the offense -- his positional distinction inside the playbook -- like how often he was blocking and involved in the run game and what percentage of the time he was lined up outside the hash marks. In fact, many of the Saints running plays actually go away from Graham's side of the field and the team, smartly, tries to protect him from dangerous blocks in that regard."
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Dec 31, 2013 18:44:15 GMT -5
"Intriguing! ESPN Stats & Info sent me some fascinating numbers on this one. Through 12 weeks, Graham has played 486 offensive snaps — 317 pass routes and 169 other snaps (either pass or run blocking). So let's split up his receiving stats into these three categories: lined up on the line as a TE, in the slot, or on the outside as a WR. Here are the numbers …
On line as TE: 63 routes, 21 targets, 13 catches, 314 yards, 4 TDs Slot receiver: 158 routes, 49 targets, 34 catches, 423 yards, 4 TDs Wide outside: 96 routes, 26 targets, 18 catches, 209 yards, 3 TDs
So he has run 80 percent of his pass routes as a slot guy or receiver. Wait, it gets better. Forty-one tight ends have run more routes on the line than Graham, including such luminaries as Jeron Mastrud (71), Allen Reisner (70) and Vance McDonald (70). Graham's 13 catches lined up on the line as a tight end are 23rd in the league. Graham has 632 yards from the slot or split wide, 49 more than any other TE. Graham's 52 catches from the slot or split wide are tied with Tony Gonzalez for most among TEs. And Graham's 75 targets from the slot or split wide are second in the league (Gonzalez, 77). "
Jimmy Graham = a wide receiver it seems so sorry Marching
|
|
|
Post by MarchingOn on Dec 31, 2013 18:57:24 GMT -5
"Intriguing! ESPN Stats & Info sent me some fascinating numbers on this one. Through 12 weeks, Graham has played 486 offensive snaps — 317 pass routes and 169 other snaps (either pass or run blocking). So let's split up his receiving stats into these three categories: lined up on the line as a TE, in the slot, or on the outside as a WR. Here are the numbers … On line as TE: 63 routes, 21 targets, 13 catches, 314 yards, 4 TDs Slot receiver: 158 routes, 49 targets, 34 catches, 423 yards, 4 TDs Wide outside: 96 routes, 26 targets, 18 catches, 209 yards, 3 TDs So he has run 80 percent of his pass routes as a slot guy or receiver. Wait, it gets better. Forty-one tight ends have run more routes on the line than Graham, including such luminaries as Jeron Mastrud (71), Allen Reisner (70) and Vance McDonald (70). Graham's 13 catches lined up on the line as a tight end are 23rd in the league. Graham has 632 yards from the slot or split wide, 49 more than any other TE. Graham's 52 catches from the slot or split wide are tied with Tony Gonzalez for most among TEs. And Graham's 75 targets from the slot or split wide are second in the league (Gonzalez, 77). " Jimmy Graham = a wide receiver it seems so sorry Marching He's still a TE. That's his natural position, that's his skillset. When Reggie Bush was in NO, he played a TON of his snaps at slot WR. Doesn't make him a WR.
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Dec 31, 2013 23:37:29 GMT -5
What if you don't own two firsts? Do you give your one for this year and next? If so I am getting Graham.
|
|