|
Post by Shaggzfate on Jul 20, 2012 16:21:40 GMT -5
I agree to this, that people must be committed first. I feel that they must pass two conditions first. A.) A set number of posts on the NFL.com forum (I was thinking 100). And B being active constantly for at least 4 weeks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2012 19:37:13 GMT -5
sorry shagg, but i will not be doing that, and nor should it be, and heres why
not everybody can be active constantly 4 weeks. and i cant tell whos been active 4 weeks straight. it just doesnt happen to everybody
also i cannot hold anybody down who doesnt have at least 100 posts either. our champion last year "bam1979" was a last minute entry on nfl.com, didnt even have 10 posts at the time he wanted to try the game last year, but became very active after that. and yet he was the best guy in the end. i wont be able to know if someones got very good skill at picking games or not just by posts. yes, ive had more bad than good on that, but i refuse to keep anybody out based upon posts. will not happen while im in charge
now when i step down or if someone else wants to take charge for a year, whomever does can do that if they want or not, but anybody that wants to participate can, but i will not put someone in if i think they arent gonna show up every week, until they promise me they can show up
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Jul 20, 2012 20:34:11 GMT -5
@ Bengal.. I guess you should basically let anyone join as long as they aren't people who are known for disturbing the peace or people who you know go away for weeks at a time. Also you may want to ask people what their holidays are like.. and if they do have holidays they should send their picks for those two weeks in ahead of time to someone..
If the people who join miss two weeks in a row un-announced they should be cut from the tourney. All of us involved can keep an eye on that.
|
|
steelcurtainjesus3
HS Varsity
The new Steelers QB???? Yeah i think its gona be a good season!!!!!
Posts: 143
|
Post by steelcurtainjesus3 on Jul 20, 2012 23:06:44 GMT -5
@ Bengal.. I guess you should basically let anyone join as long as they aren't people who are known for disturbing the peace or people who you know go away for weeks at a time. Also you may want to ask people what their holidays are like.. and if they do have holidays they should send their picks for those two weeks in ahead of time to someone.. If the people who join miss two weeks in a row un-announced they should be cut from the tourney. All of us involved can keep an eye on that. AGREED
|
|
|
Post by Shaggzfate on Jul 20, 2012 23:32:53 GMT -5
sorry shagg, but i will not be doing that, and nor should it be, and heres why not everybody can be active constantly 4 weeks. and i cant tell whos been active 4 weeks straight. it just doesnt happen to everybody also i cannot hold anybody down who doesnt have at least 100 posts either. our champion last year "bam1979" was a last minute entry on nfl.com, didnt even have 10 posts at the time he wanted to try the game last year, but became very active after that. and yet he was the best guy in the end. i wont be able to know if someones got very good skill at picking games or not just by posts. yes, ive had more bad than good on that, but i refuse to keep anybody out based upon posts. will not happen while im in charge now when i step down or if someone else wants to take charge for a year, whomever does can do that if they want or not, but anybody that wants to participate can, but i will not put someone in if i think they arent gonna show up every week, until they promise me they can show up Sorry 2 different conversations here bengal. I was meaning to be brought over to the new forums. Not for the You pick them. Yeah that would be absurd for the you pick them deal, but for the new forums its more of a way to limit any chance of a spam account getting on here. You'd have to be majorly invested in a troll account to keep it going for a month (chad) and to not lose interest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2012 8:14:52 GMT -5
@ Bengal.. I guess you should basically let anyone join as long as they aren't people who are known for disturbing the peace or people who you know go away for weeks at a time. Also you may want to ask people what their holidays are like.. and if they do have holidays they should send their picks for those two weeks in ahead of time to someone.. If the people who join miss two weeks in a row un-announced they should be cut from the tourney. All of us involved can keep an eye on that. if i think anybody is causing trouble, i will kick them. i already mentioned that in the rules i believe. but i will need feedback from anybody on here if you guys think someone is getting annoying, otherwise i cannot do anything as for kicking people out, i give them 3 weeks instead. i know that seems a little too much, but i think thats more fair IMO. and then i kick them out. if they want back in, i give them another chance. if they do it again, they are done for the year
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2012 8:16:14 GMT -5
sorry shagg, but i will not be doing that, and nor should it be, and heres why not everybody can be active constantly 4 weeks. and i cant tell whos been active 4 weeks straight. it just doesnt happen to everybody also i cannot hold anybody down who doesnt have at least 100 posts either. our champion last year "bam1979" was a last minute entry on nfl.com, didnt even have 10 posts at the time he wanted to try the game last year, but became very active after that. and yet he was the best guy in the end. i wont be able to know if someones got very good skill at picking games or not just by posts. yes, ive had more bad than good on that, but i refuse to keep anybody out based upon posts. will not happen while im in charge now when i step down or if someone else wants to take charge for a year, whomever does can do that if they want or not, but anybody that wants to participate can, but i will not put someone in if i think they arent gonna show up every week, until they promise me they can show up Sorry 2 different conversations here bengal. I was meaning to be brought over to the new forums. Not for the You pick them. Yeah that would be absurd for the you pick them deal, but for the new forums its more of a way to limit any chance of a spam account getting on here. You'd have to be majorly invested in a troll account to keep it going for a month (chad) and to not lose interest. i see what you mean. unfortunately, anybody that participates in the game i will hope that pantherfan can be brought over here, unless they are a troll we will see though. already got 27 people now. thats the same i had almost total last year
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Jul 22, 2012 21:33:56 GMT -5
"this is your account bro and where is Antonio Brown on this list!!!!!!!"
Theranker is Mantis...
|
|
steelcurtainjesus3
HS Varsity
The new Steelers QB???? Yeah i think its gona be a good season!!!!!
Posts: 143
|
Post by steelcurtainjesus3 on Jul 22, 2012 21:37:42 GMT -5
im almost positive but i didnt know at first and if it his then hes making me look like im trying to sneak him over to this site
|
|