xdeadlyxmirage
NFL Starter
 
This Guy
Disrespecting narrative film since the 15th century.
Posts: 1,557
|
Post by xdeadlyxmirage on Aug 5, 2015 21:36:24 GMT -5
Can we talk about dorsett over Cooper for a second? That was pretty unexpected. Well, over like 4 or 5 other WRs that seem like better picks, at least.
|
|
xdeadlyxmirage
NFL Starter
 
This Guy
Disrespecting narrative film since the 15th century.
Posts: 1,557
|
Post by xdeadlyxmirage on Aug 5, 2015 21:49:26 GMT -5
Don't I have the 5th pick? Because cordarelle for 6 was worse than average joes? JuggsWell here's how the order is. 1.01: Morkim via db515: --------------------------------- (originally) Mcflyers 1.02: Juggs via Morkim: ------------------------------------- Win 1.03: Mitch9234: --------------------------------------------- 9234ers 1.04: H24dog via Hebert's 2014 team: ---------------------------- Redzonefighters 1.05: Morkim via Juggs via 101mitc ---------------------------- AverageJoes 1.06: Cbagin via coltsrockjcr ------------------------------- Cordarrelle4six (Playoffs are correct) It seems to me that both the 1st/2nd and 5th/6th are messed up and if we are going to rotate them because they are ties we should rotate them the other way so that the lower scoring team has the earlier pick to start. For the 1st/2nd it is only relevant for the next 2 rounds but I think you are right about the 5th/6th.
|
|
cbagin
College Starter
Crunch Time
Posts: 541
|
Post by cbagin on Aug 5, 2015 21:51:05 GMT -5
Well here's how the order is. 1.01: Morkim via db515: --------------------------------- (originally) Mcflyers 1.02: Juggs via Morkim: ------------------------------------- Win 1.03: Mitch9234: --------------------------------------------- 9234ers 1.04: H24dog via Hebert's 2014 team: ---------------------------- Redzonefighters 1.05: Morkim via Juggs via 101mitc ---------------------------- AverageJoes 1.06: Cbagin via coltsrockjcr ------------------------------- Cordarrelle4six (Playoffs are correct) It seems to me that both the 1st/2nd and 5th/6th are messed up and if we are going to rotate them because they are ties we should rotate them the other way so that the lower scoring team has the earlier pick to start. For the 1st/2nd it is only relevant for the next 2 rounds but I think you are right about the 5th/6th. Yes exactly
|
|
|
Post by mitch9234 on Aug 5, 2015 22:00:00 GMT -5
Can we talk about dorsett over Cooper for a second? That was pretty unexpected. Who knows how Cooper is going to do with Carr. He might be good, but I'm putting more faith in Dorsett
|
|
xdeadlyxmirage
NFL Starter
 
This Guy
Disrespecting narrative film since the 15th century.
Posts: 1,557
|
Post by xdeadlyxmirage on Aug 5, 2015 22:02:11 GMT -5
Well here's how the order is. 1.01: Morkim via db515: --------------------------------- (originally) Mcflyers 1.02: Juggs via Morkim: ------------------------------------- Win 1.03: Mitch9234: --------------------------------------------- 9234ers 1.04: H24dog via Hebert's 2014 team: ---------------------------- Redzonefighters 1.05: Morkim via Juggs via 101mitc ---------------------------- AverageJoes 1.06: Cbagin via coltsrockjcr ------------------------------- Cordarrelle4six (Playoffs are correct) It seems to me that both the 1st/2nd and 5th/6th are messed up and if we are going to rotate them because they are ties we should rotate them the other way so that the lower scoring team has the earlier pick to start. For the 1st/2nd it is only relevant for the next 2 rounds but I think you are right about the 5th/6th. Yes exactly Jancey Juggs JindredWe should probably vote for whether or not to rotate picks that are tied. I don't think we should and if we rotate 1/2, and 5/6 because their records are tied, why don't we rotate 7/8 and 9/10 because they were eliminated in the same round? It seems to me to be easier and fair to just not rotate the picks and to give the earlier pick, in the top 6, to the team that scored less.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Aug 5, 2015 22:02:21 GMT -5
Can we talk about dorsett over Cooper for a second? That was pretty unexpected. Homer picks in fantasy football are fun
|
|
cbagin
College Starter
Crunch Time
Posts: 541
|
Post by cbagin on Aug 5, 2015 22:04:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mitch9234 on Aug 5, 2015 22:04:40 GMT -5
Homer picks in fantasy football are fun Actually not. Dorsett has the better QB for the long run.
|
|
h24dog
College Starter
Posts: 708
|
Post by h24dog on Aug 5, 2015 22:06:58 GMT -5
Okay guys, I'm going to wait until we figure out the order of these picks before I make my selection. Hopefully we'll get the last two owners on here by tomorrow also
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Aug 5, 2015 22:07:09 GMT -5
Actually not. Dorsett has the better QB for the long run. Most probably. Although nothing is certain. But he's not a talent like Cooper. And cooper is a lot like AJ Green his first couple years. No competition for targets. And homer picks are fun. It's no big thing.
|
|