|
Post by saskabronco on Oct 24, 2014 12:47:40 GMT -5
The true response of a guy that obviously doesn't know a damn thing. Rather than proving me wrong you just make personal attacks. If you knew me at all or read the discussions I have with people, you would know that I am currently in university doing my second degree, this time in Engineering, and that I constantly get into heated discussions about science and religion because I am very against people diving in to believe whatever they hear without proof... So I put it to you to provide any sort of proof to the giant pile of bullshit that you've been dumping on this thread. All you have are things like "the odds are so unlikely that it must be scripted." That is not proof, that is your opinion. As I stated, unlikely things happen all the time against much higher odds than the odds of these things happening. If you want to keep being the crazy guy on the subway and shouting conspiracy theories with no actual proof or evidence to your claims, just your opinions, then get used to more people ignoring you because Juggs is right, you aren't worth our time and more and more of us will just block/ignore you.
I did prove you wrong. I just explained the multiples needed to understand the difficulty of making a SB.
By your logic...2 guys running for president have a 1 in 2 chance of making it.
nothing I have said is an opinion.
I will be right when I tell you the Cards and Seattle wont make the playoffs and it wont be luck that it happens.
I Will be right when I say San Fran will win the division with no wild card.
you are acting threatened because an entertainment business isn't as random as you believe ? who's the one with reality issues here?
Also, if you are wrong in these predictions, it proves that you don't know what you're talking about. If you're right then it proves nothing... You could be right or you could be just guessing. The thing about prophets who claim to predict things is that the burden of proof is on them to prove they are what they say they are and that being right once isn't just a fluke. Being wrong proves you're a fraud.
|
|
Beastified
College Backup
I like chicken smegma
Posts: 418
|
Post by Beastified on Oct 24, 2014 13:08:11 GMT -5
This is hilarious. Troll is drawing in the meathead hook line and sinker.
|
|
|
Post by Jancey on Oct 24, 2014 14:11:23 GMT -5
What if...the troll is beast.
|
|
|
Post by saskabronco on Oct 24, 2014 14:16:27 GMT -5
What if...the troll is beast. lol Jin and I just had that same conversation, saying it would make a ton of sense. Anyways, I am pretty much done discussing this issue with him... I was interested to see where it would go, but it's clear that he's full of it and has nothing useful to fuel a realistic discussion so I can happily laugh off his ravings like I do now with the few other people here who act similarly.
|
|
|
Post by gobolts25 on Oct 24, 2014 15:13:23 GMT -5
are you serious ? are you that uneducated about logic and math probability ? dude, you need to go back to school. the dumbing down in society is blatant now. This is very sad. you are admitting you will believe what ever you are told and cant think for yourself. And yet, he doesn't believe you. Interesting...
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Oct 24, 2014 15:16:42 GMT -5
you are childishly one dimensional in your thinking. me getting predictions wrong wouldn't mean I'm wrong about games being manipulated. It would just mean I'm guessing wrong.
yet still, I'm seeing a cause and effect while you are merely hoping that random outcomes exist.
you are the one who knows nothing. You cant even see when a DB is faking chasing a wide receiver.
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Oct 24, 2014 15:18:12 GMT -5
are you serious ? are you that uneducated about logic and math probability ? dude, you need to go back to school. the dumbing down in society is blatant now. This is very sad. you are admitting you will believe what ever you are told and cant think for yourself. And yet, he doesn't believe you. Interesting...
yes, he chooses to believe all the unicorn and rainbow endings that the NFL provides instead of practical logic
|
|
|
Post by gobolts25 on Oct 24, 2014 15:30:09 GMT -5
OK, you're begging the question, O Great Arbiter of Truth Without a Shred of Tangible Evidence. Why are you here? (Other than trolling, of course.) I'm certain you get exactly the same response on every other board you've posted this conspiracy theory on. Do you think you're going to find acceptance somewhere (or, specifically, here)?
Try nutjobs.com.
|
|
Beastified
College Backup
I like chicken smegma
Posts: 418
|
Post by Beastified on Oct 24, 2014 16:57:43 GMT -5
If it weren't for me alerting the masses of his agenda and intentionally laughing in the background, this guy would be eating you guys alive right now and you wouldn't even know it.
But tbh, I'm a closet ram29jackson fan. He's just so unique. I haven't ever met a troll like him. He is persistent.
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Oct 24, 2014 17:07:06 GMT -5
OK, you're begging the question, O Great Arbiter of Truth Without a Shred of Tangible Evidence. Why are you here? (Other than trolling, of course.) I'm certain you get exactly the same response on every other board you've posted this conspiracy theory on. Do you think you're going to find acceptance somewhere (or, specifically, here)? Try nutjobs.com. I have plenty of evidence based on deductive reasoning skills. You think a lawyer is supposed to crash through a door with proof which is the crutch of the ignorant. the fact is its very disappointing that the masses are this stupid and cant even understand the most basic logic.
you cant go to and lose 4 super bowls in a row without total outside manipulation. Its a fantasy to think its remotely possible.
2 brothers/ QBs cant go to 5 super bowls in 8 years on 3 separate teams without manipulation.
to say otherwise is equivalent of believing in Santa Clause.
absolutely everything has to go right for these things to happen. Absolutely everything. It cant happen without manipulation. until you can get past that it may be difficult to finally understand additional rational thought.
|
|