|
Post by Morkim on Oct 21, 2014 21:56:29 GMT -5
Palmers injury wasn't a knee or his leg. Pretty sure they busted his throwing arm. No. It was his leg. 2005 playoffs. lol you're quick. I googled it. I was thinking something else. Was way wrong.
|
|
|
Post by cantonhall34 on Oct 21, 2014 22:12:37 GMT -5
FOR PEYTON? The hypocrisy here is deafening. So you're saying all the offensive rule changes have been with him in mind? No other team in the league benefits from the offensive emphasis? The first time they decided to "emphasize" the rules that were already in place was after NE won SB 36 over the Rams, when the "physical" nature of the game made the difference (see: clutching and grabbing). That wasn't for Peyton was it? Unless he was playing for the Rams at the time, I don't think it was. I could be wrong but I could have sworn it was Kurt Warner there. They changed the "hitting the QB at the knee" rule - aka the Tom Brady rule - for Peyton too, huh? Well, of course they did. It's supposed to apply to everyone unless you're the visiting QB at Gillette (see: Geno Smith last week). Nobody thought a whole lot about that until Tom went down for the season, and that was a few years AFTER it happened to Carson Palmer in a playoff game, but I guess he's not Tom... You can complain all you want (and you do) but isn't it funny that the only time NE has had a game in DENVER it was last year's playoffs? This will mark the third consecutive year the Broncos have had to play IN New England during the regular season. Not since Tim Tebow was the QB here did Tom and his bunch come here short of the playoffs. And you think everything is loaded for Peyton?!?! Let's be real here. Tom and Bill get as much consideration as ANYONE in the league. Don't act like it's not the case. So you think it is just some strange coincidence that the rules are changed after Peyton loses in the AFC Championship and then the Superbowl? They actually changed that rule the year before Brady hurt his knee, but nice attempt. Take it up with the NFL, scheduling rules havent changed anytime recently. I could careless about them. Tom Brady rule. Not an attempt. From the BOSTON GLOBEAnd just so you know, (which you clearly DO NOT) you're not the all-knowing. What you ARE however, is a proven Peyton (and Broncos) hater that gives nothing but backhanded compliments at best to anyone you don't like. It's not cool, it's not redeeming, and it's obvious to anyone. As time goes by you edge closer and closer to the pats18n1 loser from yesteryear. The fact about the schedule is to illustrate the point that the league doesn't have it out for New England as you have claimed it does. You probably won't believe that anyway, but there it is. One more thing...stop being so condescending.
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Oct 21, 2014 22:16:54 GMT -5
OH MY GOD.... Peyton is so much better than Brady guys... lolz, let's argue this again
|
|
|
Post by cantonhall34 on Oct 21, 2014 22:24:53 GMT -5
No. It was his leg. 2005 playoffs. lol you're quick. I googled it. I was thinking something else. Was way wrong. No biggie. Palmer was good that season and the Bengals had a real opportunity to make some noise. It was a shame he got hurt like that. Once he was outta that game Cincy had no shot.
|
|
|
Post by cantonhall34 on Oct 21, 2014 22:28:34 GMT -5
OH MY GOD.... Peyton is so much better than Brady guys... lolz, let's argue this again I was so not going there. If there's any discussion that's been worn out more, I don't know what it is.
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Oct 21, 2014 22:39:29 GMT -5
So you think it is just some strange coincidence that the rules are changed after Peyton loses in the AFC Championship and then the Superbowl? They actually changed that rule the year before Brady hurt his knee, but nice attempt. Take it up with the NFL, scheduling rules havent changed anytime recently. I could careless about them. Tom Brady rule. Not an attempt. From the BOSTON GLOBEAnd just so you know, (which you clearly DO NOT) you're not the all-knowing. What you ARE however, is a proven Peyton (and Broncos) hater that gives nothing but backhanded compliments at best to anyone you don't like. It's not cool, it's not redeeming, and it's obvious to anyone. As time goes by you edge closer and closer to the pats18n1 loser from yesteryear. The fact about the schedule is to illustrate the point that the league doesn't have it out for New England as you have claimed it does. You probably won't believe that anyway, but there it is. One more thing...stop being so condescending. The greatest QB in regular season history, what more do you want me to give him? How am I a proven Peyton hater, I give the guy plenty of compliments, but you Denver fans want me to claim he is great in the postseason or should be known as GOAT. Get over yourself, you are the one who acts like you are all knowing. Where did I claim the league had it out for New England? Stop making things up, I never said that or anything close to it.
|
|
999Bronco
NFL Draft pick
2015 Broncos - Super Bowl 50 World Champions
Posts: 1,268
|
Post by 999Bronco on Oct 21, 2014 23:02:43 GMT -5
At first I wasn't going to respond to any of your BS...but then I saw this. Season changing? I know you're trolling, but that's f**king ridiculous. At worst it's a 15 yard penalty enforced on the kick-off. Worst-case scenario, 49ers return a kick for a TD. Now, after that, Broncos probably would have continued to put up points, but no, you need EXTRA convincing. Worst-case scenario once again, 49ers win the game. It's not season altering if we lose one game. Was the blowout loss to the Chiefs by the Patriots season altering? No, I'm sure they'll finish at the top of the weak AFC North as always. No way an excessive celebration penalty alters a season. I hope we finish top of the AFC North, that would be an impressive accomplishment for an AFC East team. Just for the record the AFC East was tied for the second most wins out of any conference last season, and the AFC East is currently tied for second this season. But yeah second is really weak. I wasnt even trying to get a response out of you, but yeah that is apparently too easy. lol *East. Whenever I picture the conferences I picture this booklet I had a long time ago, and it lists the East as the first division in the AFC. I often times mix the two up. What, 8-8, 8-8, and 6-10 last year? That was a tough division, too bad the Patsies were the only team that had more wins than losses. I respond because I call out your horse shit, and as a fan defending my team, that's the right thing for me to do. When were you going to address my entire post? Never? Yeah, thought so.
|
|
|
Post by cantonhall34 on Oct 21, 2014 23:17:11 GMT -5
Tom Brady rule. Not an attempt. From the BOSTON GLOBEAnd just so you know, (which you clearly DO NOT) you're not the all-knowing. What you ARE however, is a proven Peyton (and Broncos) hater that gives nothing but backhanded compliments at best to anyone you don't like. It's not cool, it's not redeeming, and it's obvious to anyone. As time goes by you edge closer and closer to the pats18n1 loser from yesteryear. The fact about the schedule is to illustrate the point that the league doesn't have it out for New England as you have claimed it does. You probably won't believe that anyway, but there it is. One more thing...stop being so condescending. The greatest QB in regular season history, what more do you want me to give him? How am I a proven Peyton hater, I give the guy plenty of compliments, but you Denver fans want me to claim he is great in the postseason or should be known as GOAT. Get over yourself, you are the one who acts like you are all knowing. Where did I claim the league had it out for New England? Stop making things up, I never said that or anything close to it. Don't try to turn it around, dude. You're snarky BS has been proven wrong. Own it and move on. Always giving a condescending statement to people whenever you get the chance is what you've done ever since we've interacted. If I'm guilty of anything, it's lending some knowledge and perspective to things that may need it. I don't put people down. Even when I disagree with people I don't act like they're idiots. Once again, that's your style, not mine. For the record, it's not a Peyton/Denver thing for me. Denver's been MY team since before you've ever even KNOWN about the frickin' game. Peyton coming here hasn't made me any more of a supporter than I already was. I've told you that many times, so if you can't remember that, that's a YOU problem. SOME people are not frontrunners or bandwagon jumpers like you think they are, and some people know that the game's existed since before 2001. And yes, you HAVE talked about how things are rigged against NE before, complaining how the league wants to "get" them or bitching about the spygate crap. Again, if you can't remember that, that's another YOU problem. SO - if that's not clear enough, this conversation is over.
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Oct 21, 2014 23:34:34 GMT -5
The greatest QB in regular season history, what more do you want me to give him? How am I a proven Peyton hater, I give the guy plenty of compliments, but you Denver fans want me to claim he is great in the postseason or should be known as GOAT. Get over yourself, you are the one who acts like you are all knowing. Where did I claim the league had it out for New England? Stop making things up, I never said that or anything close to it. Don't try to turn it around, dude. You're snarky BS has been proven wrong. Own it and move on. Always giving a condescending statement to people whenever you get the chance is what you've done ever since we've interacted. If I'm guilty of anything, it's lending some knowledge and perspective to things that may need it. I don't put people down. Even when I disagree with people I don't act like they're idiots. Once again, that's your style, not mine. For the record, it's not a Peyton/Denver thing for me. Denver's been MY team since before you've ever even KNOWN about the frickin' game. Peyton coming here hasn't made me any more of a supporter than I already was. I've told you that many times, so if you can't remember that, that's a YOU problem. SOME people are not frontrunners or bandwagon jumpers like you think they are, and some people know that the game's existed since before 2001. And yes, you HAVE talked about how things are rigged against NE before, complaining how the league wants to "get" them or bitching about the spygate crap. Again, if you can't remember that, that's another YOU problem. SO - if that's not clear enough, this conversation is over. I have never said the league is out to get New England, find me just one post of mine that says anything close to that. I am the last person to blame the league or the refs. I dont even start half of these debates, but yet you want to put that blame on me? laughable. I even backed Peyton up in this thread, but yeah I am a Peyton hater...
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Oct 21, 2014 23:36:14 GMT -5
I hope we finish top of the AFC North, that would be an impressive accomplishment for an AFC East team. Just for the record the AFC East was tied for the second most wins out of any conference last season, and the AFC East is currently tied for second this season. But yeah second is really weak. I wasnt even trying to get a response out of you, but yeah that is apparently too easy. lol *East. Whenever I picture the conferences I picture this booklet I had a long time ago, and it lists the East as the first division in the AFC. I often times mix the two up. What, 8-8, 8-8, and 6-10 last year? That was a tough division, too bad the Patsies were the only team that had more wins than losses. I respond because I call out your horse shit, and as a fan defending my team, that's the right thing for me to do. When were you going to address my entire post? Never? Yeah, thought so. Fact: The AFC East had the second most wins of any division last year. Fact: The AFC East has the second most wins of any division currently. So you tell me how is that weak? Call it defending your team, I really dont care.
|
|