|
Post by plax on Feb 27, 2013 20:24:00 GMT -5
I love the idea of the Giants trading down, but do you really think they pass on Mingo or Moore if sitting in their lap at 19? I would love us getting Ogletree at 24 if still there and pending a trade down with IND, and the mid-round guys are strong this year, so an extra 3rd helps a great deal I dont think they would pass them up. Nor do i see them taking Teo(although id love to ave em) the NY media would execute him. now Eiffert to me is more appealing. We are weak in the TE position. Eiffert was basically the #1 reciever for the Irish. hes very good You want a TE? Interesting. I think that even if we lose Bennett, we can hold off on TE until the mid-to-late rounds. First off, we have Adrien Robinson, who was being raved about. And this TE class is deep with talent.
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Feb 27, 2013 20:58:33 GMT -5
I love the idea of the Giants trading down, but do you really think they pass on Mingo or Moore if sitting in their lap at 19? I would love us getting Ogletree at 24 if still there and pending a trade down with IND, and the mid-round guys are strong this year, so an extra 3rd helps a great deal An inside source (my brother) assures me that the Giants D-line is set as it is. He said it has something to do with the NASCAR package. I don't really know what that means.
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Feb 27, 2013 21:00:13 GMT -5
As far as TE, the Giants have proven they don't care about tight ends. They'll start ANYONE who can block. There is no way they blow a first round pick on one.
They won super bowls with Kevin Boss and Bear Pascoe :/
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Feb 27, 2013 21:02:03 GMT -5
90%-100% odds? No. such. thing. Last year, I correctly predicted 11 of the picks, and I didn't even bother predicting trades. Also, these odds are based on how likely it is that the team would take the player if they could at that spot. IE: there is a 100% chance Green Bay will take Margus Hunt if he's available.
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Feb 27, 2013 21:08:21 GMT -5
Colts trading up for a DE would be stupid....sorry. Hughes and Mathis still there. Remember that they are getting a BUNCH of complementary picks. They're probably trading up somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by Jancey on Feb 27, 2013 21:18:03 GMT -5
Colts need an OG badly...and a CB.
|
|
|
Post by sean2457 on Feb 27, 2013 21:19:56 GMT -5
Colts need an OG badly...and a CB. I doubt the Colts trade up to 19th to grab a DE myself BUT since the G and CB classes have some depth to them, they can wait to grab one and take a BPA wherever their 1st might be.
|
|
|
Post by Jancey on Feb 27, 2013 21:22:44 GMT -5
Maybe. DE is a need too, but 1st priority should be protecting Luck.
|
|
|
Post by danb6177 on Feb 27, 2013 21:29:08 GMT -5
I dont think they would pass them up. Nor do i see them taking Teo(although id love to ave em) the NY media would execute him. now Eiffert to me is more appealing. We are weak in the TE position. Eiffert was basically the #1 reciever for the Irish. hes very good You want a TE? Interesting. I think that even if we lose Bennett, we can hold off on TE until the mid-to-late rounds. First off, we have Adrien Robinson, who was being raved about. And this TE class is deep with talent. Agreed the need for the TE isnt trivial, Giants use them to block mostly.But the need for a DE or a linebacker isnt trivial either. Adrien Robinson will not play for awhile if ever as a starter. Bennet sucks I just think Eiffert is a great talent and is NFL starter ready right now. Im sure the giants wont pick em but Yeah i would. Hes 6-6 250 and has hands like a reciever. Definetly the best TE in the pack and he is gonna go 1st round for sure.
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Feb 28, 2013 1:34:57 GMT -5
I like the idea of trading down, but if Elam is avalible I would rather just take him there.
|
|