|
Post by Jancey on Jan 24, 2013 16:45:26 GMT -5
That WW system is fine with me...and I agree...Sack should be 1 point. As for the .25 PPC and PPIC...consider it's only .5 PPR and every QB (that's starting on a team) will complete more than 50% of his passes, PPR should be bumped up to 1 PPR. But regardless of the QB completion settings, whether there's points or not, I would prefer 1 PPR. I would also like at least a little bit of IOP return yards. Like say... .25 points per 10 yards. But we can worry about the scoring later...right now we just need to figure out who's gonna be in the league, what site it's gonna be on, etc. And mirage, I can't do it on nfl.com. Any other site is good with me
|
|
cbagin
College Starter
Crunch Time
Posts: 541
|
Post by cbagin on Jan 24, 2013 17:01:16 GMT -5
Hey guys I might be interested in joining this.
|
|
|
Post by Jindred on Jan 24, 2013 17:57:51 GMT -5
That WW system is fine with me...and I agree...Sack should be 1 point. As for the .25 PPC and PPIC...consider it's only .5 PPR and every QB (that's starting on a team) will complete more than 50% of his passes, PPR should be bumped up to 1 PPR. But regardless of the QB completion settings, whether there's points or not, I would prefer 1 PPR. I would also like at least a little bit of IOP return yards. Like say... .25 points per 10 yards. But we can worry about the scoring later...right now we just need to figure out who's gonna be in the league, what site it's gonna be on, etc. And mirage, I can't do it on nfl.com. Any other site is good with me My vote would be Yahoo, I am good with the WW system.
|
|
hebertespinosa
College Starter
Okay, now you know what my favorite team is.
Posts: 602
|
Post by hebertespinosa on Jan 24, 2013 19:15:45 GMT -5
Count me in. I usually play on standard, non-auction, non-PPR leagues and I played an IDP one for the first time this season. I am willing to try something new this time.
|
|
xdeadlyxmirage
NFL Starter
This Guy
Disrespecting narrative film since the 15th century.
Posts: 1,557
|
Post by xdeadlyxmirage on Jan 25, 2013 11:56:22 GMT -5
That WW system is fine with me...and I agree...Sack should be 1 point. As for the .25 PPC and PPIC...consider it's only .5 PPR and every QB (that's starting on a team) will complete more than 50% of his passes, PPR should be bumped up to 1 PPR. But regardless of the QB completion settings, whether there's points or not, I would prefer 1 PPR. I would also like at least a little bit of IOP return yards. Like say... .25 points per 10 yards. But we can worry about the scoring later...right now we just need to figure out who's gonna be in the league, what site it's gonna be on, etc. And mirage, I can't do it on nfl.com. Any other site is good with me I don't know what fantasy sites are good. The one I use for the only league I play costs money. I would like to find a free one maybe a site that specializes in dynasty leagues but if someone knows a good site for this that is fine by me. xdeadlyxmirage, Mitch 101, Jancey, Jindred, Coltsrockjcr, Cbagin, Herbertespinosa and Beastified are the people with interest thus far. That is 8 thus far. Are we looking for 10, 12, 16? I was thinking 12 would be a good target but bigger leagues are always fine by me.
|
|
|
Post by awesomeace on Jan 25, 2013 16:30:52 GMT -5
I've never used it before but I heard fleaflicker is a good site to use. Just that the graphics aren't the best
|
|
xdeadlyxmirage
NFL Starter
This Guy
Disrespecting narrative film since the 15th century.
Posts: 1,557
|
Post by xdeadlyxmirage on Feb 8, 2013 15:49:38 GMT -5
Bumping this.
|
|
|
Post by goatboyzs on Feb 9, 2013 18:44:23 GMT -5
I would be in as well. Love dynasties. Have you tried Fantrax. Their site is awesome
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Feb 13, 2013 19:04:31 GMT -5
Hey can we make this salary cap?? That would be REALLY cool.
|
|
|
Post by Jancey on Feb 13, 2013 19:06:01 GMT -5
Have you ever done a salary cap mitch? I just started and I LOVE it! Very, very interesting kind of FF. So many different things to take into account with every move...and I'm just getting into it.
|
|