Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2013 18:58:02 GMT -5
Bengal you can add the Raiders to that list. I don't know if DMC will be resigned or traded, but I am fairly sure his time is limited with McKenzie at the helm. He would want a more affordable, more reliable back for the future. Drafting now, and training behind mcfadden for 2 years or so would be ideal. Besides TJ can only play in preseason, and Goodson is still fumble prone. It's possible, I was thinking of putting them on there, but then again they have massive problems and I mean massive against the run
|
|
|
Post by Shaggzfate on Jan 8, 2013 19:15:42 GMT -5
Bengal you can add the Raiders to that list. I don't know if DMC will be resigned or traded, but I am fairly sure his time is limited with McKenzie at the helm. He would want a more affordable, more reliable back for the future. Drafting now, and training behind mcfadden for 2 years or so would be ideal. Besides TJ can only play in preseason, and Goodson is still fumble prone. It's possible, I was thinking of putting them on there, but then again they have massive problems and I mean massive against the run Our whole D needs work, and I'm suspecting part of that will come form the under-coaching staff. But my main issue is right now, do we really get that good of a value in the first round? Or, should we trade down, pick up an extra pick or two and take a stab at some insurance while we are at it. Honestly, I'm looking at what I would do if I had the choice. However, barring my wish to come true, I won't be the next OC hahaha, and it will be in large part up to them what happens. The clarify, I think we get the best value this coming year by focusing the middle part of the draft on DL and DB. I also foresee Reggie bringing in some decent (not huge name) FA's to help out this year, where-as last year we couldn't. At the end of the day, with how everything is looking now spending a second (if we trade down) or third on a player like Lacy, Gillislee, or maybe Burkhead around the 6th if he is still there. I think Reggie will focus on value vs need instead of just filling the empty holes with who ever fits the mold.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2013 21:00:53 GMT -5
Bengal you can add the Raiders to that list. I don't know if DMC will be resigned or traded, but I am fairly sure his time is limited with McKenzie at the helm. He would want a more affordable, more reliable back for the future. Drafting now, and training behind mcfadden for 2 years or so would be ideal. Besides TJ can only play in preseason, and Goodson is still fumble prone. the raiders arent even on the list, so im not sure what your talking about RB is the least of there problems they need help on EVERYTHING on defense. the raiders draft will be all defense
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2013 21:04:39 GMT -5
i can tell you right now the bengals wont be taking a RB in the 1st round we got SO many other better options our needs are RB, DE, OLB, ILB, CB, and S, but there wont be a RB we will take in the 1st round players like bjoern werner, jarvis jones, barkevious mingo, damontree moore, dee miller, and manti teo are players i would take in a heartbeat, but i cannot expect to be on the board my board right now for interested players 1.CB Xavier Rhodes Florida State 2.DE Dion Jordon Oregon 3.DE Ezekiel Ansah BYU 4.DE Sam Montgomery LSU 5.FS Eric Reid LSU 6.SS Matt Elam Florida 7.ILB Kevin Minter LSU 8.DE Alex Okafor Texas 9.CB Johnathan Banks Mississippi State 10.FS Kenny Vaccaro 11.DE Margus Hunt SMU 12.RB Giovani Bernard North Carolina 13.CB Jordon Poyer Oregon State 14.RB Eddie Lacy Alabama thats who i would take over both of those guys on bengals board RBs are worth a dime a dozen. having a good OL is what will matter, so teams are not taking RBs early any more RB is a need for the bengals, but i can call it right now that the bengals will go defense in the 1st round Where the Bengals are picking, they have a more realistic shot of landing an RB. How are the Bengal needs mainly defensive when they lost in the playoffs because of their offense? Ok, correction: Maybe they lost because Andy Dalton is an average QB, but BJE's only positive trait was that he didn't fumble, and this season he had a 3.9 YPC with 3 fumbles. just because the defense was the reason for this teams success doesnt mean that shouldnt be the focus on the draft yes dalton was the reason we lost in the playoffs, and now i serious start to question if hes even capable of getting the job done but the reason the defense was good was mike zimmer. take him out of the picture and the defense will suck. how many big name players on the defense do you know? most people will say geno atkins and michael johnson and thats it. zimmer is working with alot of nfl draft busts and washed up players, yet those players are willing to run through a brickwall for him if zimmer is gone (which i doubt he leaves to go be a head coach this year) the defense will be weak. thats why they need to get younger and work on that mainly for the draft. not to mention we got alot of starters who are free agents offense is still young, so it will improve
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2013 21:09:47 GMT -5
Thanks for posting this, I don't see how the Bengals can't draft an RB in the 1st round. Their O is lacking and would be almost as bad as the Rams if it weren't for Green we will draft a RB in the 2nd round MAYBE. bernard OR lacy will be available at the 37th pick there thanks to the carson palmer trade. if worse case scenario comes, we will take montee ball this team need to focus on defense in the 1st round. DE mainly because we got 3 DE's who were very productive last year that will be free agents in michael johnson, wallace gilberry, and robert geathers. geathers i could care less about, but i dont wanna lose gilberry. I DEFINITELY dont wanna lose johnson who had over 10 sacks
|
|
|
Post by Shaggzfate on Jan 8, 2013 21:34:10 GMT -5
Bengal you can add the Raiders to that list. I don't know if DMC will be resigned or traded, but I am fairly sure his time is limited with McKenzie at the helm. He would want a more affordable, more reliable back for the future. Drafting now, and training behind mcfadden for 2 years or so would be ideal. Besides TJ can only play in preseason, and Goodson is still fumble prone. the raiders arent even on the list, so im not sure what your talking about RB is the least of there problems they need help on EVERYTHING on defense. the raiders draft will be all defense I do not know what I said that was unclear but I perfectly explained my rationale behind this. Also I said you should ADD them. And Reggie will not have an all defensive draft, he will make most his moves to shore up the D in FA by signing midlevel talent to bring in and groom as not to continue overpaying talent.
|
|
|
Post by lostabroad2 on Jan 9, 2013 5:53:07 GMT -5
I think the chances of Steven Jackson being a Rams player next year are around 15%. The Rams won't go into camp with Richardson and Pead as their #1 & #2 RBs. If they try to do that Richardson would be advised to hold out for more money. That would put the Rams in a really bad spot. The Rams have to add a 'name' FA RB or draft one in the top 3 rounds. It's not the Rams biggest need but it's financial politics. Ideally they'll add a FA for around $1.5M.
|
|
|
Post by goatboyzs on Jan 9, 2013 9:10:21 GMT -5
What about Jacksonville? They are not happy with MJD. LOL
|
|
steeldevil
NFL Draft pick
The King of the Queen City
Posts: 1,238
|
Post by steeldevil on Jan 9, 2013 15:57:51 GMT -5
lol if the Steelers pick an rb in the 1st I will ram my head against the wall repetitively....
|
|
|
Post by Jancey on Jan 9, 2013 16:00:42 GMT -5
lol if the Steelers pick an rb in the 1st I will ram my head against the wall repetitively....
|
|