|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 14, 2015 19:49:17 GMT -5
IE you are still too mentally childish and need to believe lies to survive. Yes, the Buffalo example is plenty for an intelligent person. You are saying that you believe everything went absolutely perfect for 1 team four years in a row. You are saying you are dumb enough to believe a back QB who threw 47 passes all year can lead the greatest comeback ever with no run game in the feezing cold.
1920 ? show me where corruption has died and become passé since then......? sports leagues were invented by gamblers for gambling. That has never changed
I think you're misusing the word intelligent. Because that word simply means they have the capacity for learning and learn well. But you can be incredibly intelligent and uneducated. The word I think you're looking for is crazy. "The Buffalo example should be enough for a crazy person" what you are admitting is you believe a fantasy with no proof. I am showing circumstantial evidence. That's right, I have the capacity for learning while you soak in cognitive dissonance and denial.
you are an official fool for believing the Bills 4 SBs can happen without manipulation
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 8, 2015 14:13:45 GMT -5
a team winning a game isn't a proven fact that it wasn't done without manipulation and that's all you have against me.Poor logic on your part. You are still hoping by faith that its true while I have given historic and circumstantial evidence that gamblers and corrupt mafia were the people that started the original nfl. If that 'fixisin' link is your proof, man are you deluded. But let's say that it's true that the NFL was started by the shady elements you describe. In 1920. Think things might have changed in the near-century since? Even then, it's a leap of faith (i.e., once again, complete lack of evidence) to assume that the games are scripted. Circumstantial evidence? Really? The circumstances being that a team made it to the SB four years running? Sorry, you have no smoking gun...you don't even have a fizzle. IE you are still too mentally childish and need to believe lies to survive. Yes, the Buffalo example is plenty for an intelligent person. You are saying that you believe everything went absolutely perfect for 1 team four years in a row. You are saying you are dumb enough to believe a back QB who threw 47 passes all year can lead the greatest comeback ever with no run game in the feezing cold.
1920 ? show me where corruption has died and become passé since then......? sports leagues were invented by gamblers for gambling. That has never changed
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 7, 2015 15:49:01 GMT -5
I'm not saying that it's definitely going on, but its definitely a possibility.. And Rey, before you come here raging at me about the boys game, the Boys played well enough to win. They earned it in the second half and I'm not one of the people saying the call cost the Lions the game, but the Lions cost the Lions the game by not putting the game away with their numerous opportunities. 1 call doesn't decide a game. However, the picked up flag was BS and definitely changed the game and really hurt the Lions' chances. talk about brainwashing yourself LOL
you just said the games are staged but excused it.
you cant have it both ways. If they are manipulating for a better match up..then that is what they are doing
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 7, 2015 15:10:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 7, 2015 15:05:03 GMT -5
Saints black pants with no stripe is mime/ballerina gay
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 7, 2015 15:03:55 GMT -5
Bengals need to go back to this
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 7, 2015 14:46:17 GMT -5
Dallas Broncos Ravens
what the heck,lets pick Panthers
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 7, 2015 14:40:41 GMT -5
a team winning a game isn't a proven fact that it wasn't done without manipulation and that's all you have against me.Poor logic on your part. You are still hoping by faith that its true while I have given historic and circumstantial evidence that gamblers and corrupt mafia were the people that started the original nfl.
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 2, 2015 18:05:49 GMT -5
this is a line of bull. A complete lie that you have bought. No man and no team can be that successful without complete and total manipulation. The fact is you as well have no proof what so ever other than faith that it wasn't manipulated Actually I do have the proof of what I said. It's called history. Go back and review what Paul Brown's contributions to the game were and you will see how he was ahead of the league and it took some time for the rest to catch up. As a matter of fact, many of the things we take for granted in the league today were a direct result of Paul Brown's influence, including some plays that are still being run by offenses, the pass pocket, classroom coaching, playbooks (as they are), facemasks, the radio in the helmet to relay the plays to the player on the field, etc. Doesn't really take much effort to look into those things, and you're a smart person apparently, but I think your efforts in this particular argument are misplaced. Yeah, like everyone, I believe that sometimes the leagues might "steer" the results in a particular direction because certain outcomes are "better for the league" as a whole, but to claim that EVERY outcome is "rigged" as you're saying - again without the hard evidence necessary to actually make that claim - is illogical at best. Sometimes people can see the same play and have different viewpoints, even when it's clear what happened. Also, it does nothing to HELP any argument you're trying to make by referring to everyone else as idiots when you clearly have no hard evidence to prove anything you're saying here. SHOW the evidence where this is clearly proven and maybe things will be different, but either way it still doesn't make anyone else an idiot because they're not buying your very flawed argument here.
LOL that doesn't qualify as history. That qualifies as a made up story you read and believed.
Actually I do have the proof of what I said. It's called history. Go back and review what Paul Brown's contributions to the game were and you will see how he was ahead of the league and it took some time for the rest to catch up. As a matter of fact, many of the things we take for granted in the league today were a direct result of Paul Brown's influence, including some plays that are still being run by offenses, the pass pocket, classroom coaching, playbooks (as they are), facemasks, the radio in the helmet to relay the plays to the player on the field, etc. not one damn thing here proves games aren't manipulated. It just means you know how to read.
prove to me it actually played out without manipulation...you cant.
that's a story they made up after all the teams took a dive against the Browns
|
|
|
Post by ram29jackson on Jan 2, 2015 18:01:44 GMT -5
I guess that means it's the colts/Denver. oh yes, its so important to know that.....the point was,it wont be the Pats. I could care less what the order is or the alignment. And I did in fact mention the Colts, so your factoid is a waste of time.
a third string QB ? really ?
|
|