|
Post by Juggs on Apr 13, 2016 15:15:41 GMT -5
Oh I didn't read your post explaining that.
What did you put for Titans needs? Pass rusher should be way down the list, but I could see us ignoring needs of Floyd is there.
|
|
|
Post by cityofchamps on Apr 18, 2016 16:18:48 GMT -5
updated
|
|
craig440
College Starter
My dog
Posts: 547
|
Post by craig440 on Apr 18, 2016 16:55:21 GMT -5
I don't think we will take Tunsil. But your list showing Ramsey already gone, we might. Tunsil would make a log jam at Tackle. We just signed our two tackles at semi big money. So one of the three would have to sit. I think we will go defense.
|
|
|
Post by cityofchamps on Apr 18, 2016 18:08:15 GMT -5
I don't think we will take Tunsil. But your list showing Ramsey already gone, we might. Tunsil would make a log jam at Tackle. We just signed our two tackles at semi big money. So one of the three would have to sit. I think we will go defense. Fluker is a UFA after next season. They might move Barksdale to Guard or I think they might trade Dunlap. I don't think he is the long term answer for the Chargers at OT. EDIT: You know what, I think I might end up switching Tunsil and Ramsey. That makes more sense for both teams actually. And I am convinced that the Browns are committed to wasting another year by thinking RG3 is their answer at QB.
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Apr 18, 2016 18:23:15 GMT -5
Nassib and Thomas are really good fits, certainly possible at 61/62.
I think we will take Bullard now lol, although it is possible we are moving away from that type of DT. Pats also cut DT Chris Jones, who was a similar build and style to Easley and Bullard. I think it is possible we are moving towards bigger DT's, since we played nickel sets over 80 percent of the time last year and bigger DT's can help offset the loss of a LB in the run game.
|
|
craig440
College Starter
My dog
Posts: 547
|
Post by craig440 on Apr 18, 2016 18:32:03 GMT -5
I don't think we will take Tunsil. But your list showing Ramsey already gone, we might. Tunsil would make a log jam at Tackle. We just signed our two tackles at semi big money. So one of the three would have to sit. I think we will go defense. Fluker is a UFA after next season. They might move Barksdale to Guard or I think they might trade Dunlap. I don't think he is the long term answer for the Chargers at OT. EDIT: You know what, I think I might end up switching Tunsil and Ramsey. That makes more sense for both teams actually. And I am convinced that the Browns are committed to wasting another year by thinking RG3 is their answer at QB. I was thinking the same thing about Dunlap. If we do draft Tunsil that could happen. We have had so many injuries on the OL the last two years, who knows what they are thinking. Dunlap has a big contract but 1.2 million of it is incentives I think.
|
|
|
Post by Juggs on Apr 20, 2016 16:16:16 GMT -5
Nassib and Thomas are really good fits, certainly possible at 61/62. I think we will take Bullard now lol, although it is possible we are moving away from that type of DT. Pats also cut DT Chris Jones, who was a similar build and style to Easley and Bullard. I think it is possible we are moving towards bigger DT's, since we played nickel sets over 80 percent of the time last year and bigger DT's can help offset the loss of a LB in the run game. Maybe they'll draft Chris Jones to replace Chris Jones
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Apr 20, 2016 18:39:37 GMT -5
Nassib and Thomas are really good fits, certainly possible at 61/62. I think we will take Bullard now lol, although it is possible we are moving away from that type of DT. Pats also cut DT Chris Jones, who was a similar build and style to Easley and Bullard. I think it is possible we are moving towards bigger DT's, since we played nickel sets over 80 percent of the time last year and bigger DT's can help offset the loss of a LB in the run game. Maybe they'll draft Chris Jones to replace Chris Jones It could actually happen lol. For awhile I was worried they would draft Chris Jones, when we still had Chris Jones. How confusing would that be if they lined up next to each other.
|
|