Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2014 23:19:34 GMT -5
Who is the browns QB? Who cares? Their the Browns. It's not like they have Philip Rivers or something.
|
|
|
Post by cityofchamps on Aug 19, 2014 23:27:54 GMT -5
Innocent until proven guilty. I have never defended his "actions" as you claim I did since they haven't been proven to have happened. They are related because they both have absolutely nothing to do with this conversation on Johnny Manziel, yet you brought it into it. lol your really trying to stretch my words. Good luck, you have defended Ben's actions on several occasions. Multiple people here have seen you defend Ben. If I want to do some digging, I am sure I can find at least one of your posts defending Ben. You can dig however much you would like however, and I guarantee you will find no posts of me claiming Hernandez has not done anything. Back to the point, please answer my question. Why is Ben aloud to put himself in these situations, but Johnny is not? I have NEVER defended rape. I have only said Ben is innocent until proven guilty. That is all. Don't put words in my mouth. And I have not made the claim that you proclaim Hernandez to be innocent. That is not the point. The point I am trying to make is that you felt the need to bring up Ben (for reasons best known to yourself), even though he had nothing to do with the conversation we were having about Manziel's immaturity. I only brought up Hernandez in order how to demonstrate how stupid it is to attack someone over something that has nothing to do with the conversation.
|
|
|
Post by saskabronco on Aug 20, 2014 0:29:03 GMT -5
lol your really trying to stretch my words. Good luck, you have defended Ben's actions on several occasions. Multiple people here have seen you defend Ben. If I want to do some digging, I am sure I can find at least one of your posts defending Ben. You can dig however much you would like however, and I guarantee you will find no posts of me claiming Hernandez has not done anything. Back to the point, please answer my question. Why is Ben aloud to put himself in these situations, but Johnny is not? I have NEVER defended rape. I have only said Ben is innocent until proven guilty. That is all. Don't put words in my mouth. And I have not made the claim that you proclaim Hernandez to be innocent. That is not the point. The point I am trying to make is that you felt the need to bring up Ben (for reasons best known to yourself), even though he had nothing to do with the conversation we were having about Manziel's immaturity. I only brought up Hernandez in order how to demonstrate how stupid it is to attack someone over something that has nothing to do with the conversation. The point, CoC, is that Ben had major maturity issues when he started out as well. You defended him in those instances, while you criticize Manziel very strongly for pretty much the same thing. I think that we can just chalk all of this up to homer bias, because that's all it is. Most of us have a bias to our favorite team. And you seem to just have a severe hate on for the Browns.. Just like Patskid has for Peyton. This argument is getting very repetitive though...
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Aug 20, 2014 0:57:58 GMT -5
lol your really trying to stretch my words. Good luck, you have defended Ben's actions on several occasions. Multiple people here have seen you defend Ben. If I want to do some digging, I am sure I can find at least one of your posts defending Ben. You can dig however much you would like however, and I guarantee you will find no posts of me claiming Hernandez has not done anything. Back to the point, please answer my question. Why is Ben aloud to put himself in these situations, but Johnny is not? I have NEVER defended rape. I have only said Ben is innocent until proven guilty. That is all. Don't put words in my mouth. And I have not made the claim that you proclaim Hernandez to be innocent. That is not the point. The point I am trying to make is that you felt the need to bring up Ben (for reasons best known to yourself), even though he had nothing to do with the conversation we were having about Manziel's immaturity. I only brought up Hernandez in order how to demonstrate how stupid it is to attack someone over something that has nothing to do with the conversation. Where did I say you defended rape? Please dont put words in my mouth. Are you going to answer my question?
|
|
|
Post by patriotsk1d on Aug 20, 2014 1:03:38 GMT -5
And I dont know if Ben did either of those rapes. It certainly doesnt look good when you get into that situation twice in a matter of months. Looks even worse when you have to pay the victim off. I dont believe in the whole women looking for money thing either. She likely wanted it to go away just as much as Ben did, for different reasons though.
Ben's motorcycle accident was more immature than anything Johnny has done though, and you cant deny that happened.
|
|
|
Post by steelersfan4life56 on Aug 20, 2014 9:35:55 GMT -5
Well the Browns make Hoyer the starter. Well that sucks.
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Aug 20, 2014 20:30:40 GMT -5
Well the Browns make Hoyer the starter. Well that sucks. Sucks for the Browns... There best QB is on the bench!! Talking about Connor Shaw of course
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Aug 20, 2014 20:34:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by steelersfan4life56 on Aug 20, 2014 20:36:30 GMT -5
Well the Browns make Hoyer the starter. Well that sucks. Sucks for the Browns... There best QB is on the bench!! Talking about Connor Shaw of course LOL he did look good against those backups.
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Aug 20, 2014 20:37:17 GMT -5
Sucks for the Browns... There best QB is on the bench!! Talking about Connor Shaw of course LOL he did look good against those backups. He is gonna be an NFL Supastar you just wait!
|
|