|
Post by patriotsk1d on Feb 9, 2014 23:05:06 GMT -5
I'll make a bet that the Rams are under 10-6 Beastified I'd get in on that. Same here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2014 23:05:33 GMT -5
Home: Denver Broncos - We are going to lose one of these, and I want to put W here, but I'll call it a tie to wuss out. Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - W New England Patriots - L New York Jets - W Tennessee Titans - W St. Louis Rams - W Seattle Seahawks - L Away: Denver Broncos - L Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - L Buffalo Bills - W Miami Dolphins - W Pittsburgh Steelers - L Arizona Cardinals - W San Francisco 49ers - L Officially guessing 9-6-1, but I guess 9-7. Man I already hate out schedule. We'll have to go 4-2 or 5-1 in Division to make the playoffs I bet. 101mitch What do you think? Wow, way to be over-generous. The Chiefs will lose to the Broncos twice, the Cardinals, the Seahawks, the 49ers, once or twice to the Chargers, and then lose 1-2 more that they probably shouldn't. 6-10 to 9-7 at best.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 9, 2014 23:05:37 GMT -5
Wow.. This schedule sucks. Home: Denver Broncos - W! Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - W New England Patriots - L New York Jets - W Tennessee Titans - W St. Louis Rams - W Seattle Seahawks - L Away: Denver Broncos - L Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - L Buffalo Bills - W Miami Dolphins - W Pittsburgh Steelers - W Arizona Cardinals - L San Francisco 49ers - L 10-6. Official guess 9-7. We'll drop one of the W's I have. I think we'll snag a WC, but lose as usual. Of course this all depends on FA and Draft We play 5 games against the 4 teams in the divisional championships this year. lol.
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Feb 9, 2014 23:07:16 GMT -5
Home: Denver Broncos - We are going to lose one of these, and I want to put W here, but I'll call it a tie to wuss out. Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - W New England Patriots - L New York Jets - W Tennessee Titans - W St. Louis Rams - W Seattle Seahawks - L Away: Denver Broncos - L Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - L Buffalo Bills - W Miami Dolphins - W Pittsburgh Steelers - L Arizona Cardinals - W San Francisco 49ers - L Officially guessing 9-6-1, but I guess 9-7. Man I already hate out schedule. We'll have to go 4-2 or 5-1 in Division to make the playoffs I bet. 101mitch What do you think? Wow, way to be over-generous. The Chiefs will lose to the Broncos twice, the Cardinals, the Seahawks, the 49ers, once or twice to the Chargers, and then lose 1-2 more that they probably shouldn't. 6-10 to 9-7 at best. Screw avatar bets. I am willing to bet cash the Chiefs win more than the Rams.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 9, 2014 23:07:33 GMT -5
Home: Denver Broncos - We are going to lose one of these, and I want to put W here, but I'll call it a tie to wuss out. Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - W New England Patriots - L New York Jets - W Tennessee Titans - W St. Louis Rams - W Seattle Seahawks - L Away: Denver Broncos - L Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - L Buffalo Bills - W Miami Dolphins - W Pittsburgh Steelers - L Arizona Cardinals - W San Francisco 49ers - L Officially guessing 9-6-1, but I guess 9-7. Man I already hate out schedule. We'll have to go 4-2 or 5-1 in Division to make the playoffs I bet. 101mitch What do you think? Wow, way to be over-generous. The Chiefs will lose to the Broncos twice, the Cardinals, the Seahawks, the 49ers, once or twice to the Chargers, and then lose 1-2 more that they probably shouldn't. 6-10 to 9-7 at best. You know I'm a Chiefs fan, right? And I agreed with all that you said except I think we can beat the Cardinals.
|
|
|
Post by plax on Feb 9, 2014 23:08:03 GMT -5
If you want to argue the Giants with me, know your stuff. The Giants were actually a very good run stopping team last year. They held AP, McCoy, Charles, and Forte to an average of less than 3 yards per carry. Once again, know your stuff "Mr. Cocky". Didn't think someone could even be cocky over their mediocre team. Because apparently you will have "easy wins", when nothing comes easy. Ask Eagle about the Giants/Eagles game where he said the same. Ask Denver when they played Jacksonville. "Subpar" Giants of 2013 = 7-9 Supposed-2014 Rams of 2013 = 7-9 Nicks will be gone? Maybe. Nicks barely did much this year, and with our new offensive system, we will be fine on offense again. You wouldn't know how much of a problem Gilbride was last year because you are clueless about the Giants - you just look at boxscores (which is funny bc you have no clue about the Giants run stopping defense). And Jernigan and Randle will also be big parts of the offense next year, and both will be very good. And, your point is? The Giants may have stopped some of the more premier rushers, but that's because all they did was focus on them, and as a result got picked apart in the passing game. You know what game really set the tone for the Giants to focus on stopping the run? Week 3. 0-38. 200 yds rushing. The Giants won't be able to do that with the Rams, because just like every other team the Giants tried to do that to, they then got torched in the air. The Rams-Giants game will be eerily reminiscent of that wk3 game this year. We got picked apart? Smith didn't pick up apart. Freeman did not pick us apart. Cutler was able to hit Marshall for big gains, but Jeffrey was held in check from what I can remember, as was Bennett. And you are using wk3 as your benchmark for the Giants? That was their low-point. You might not even know, but the Giants finished the year 7-3. Beason changed the entire culture of the defense. And you bring up wk3 as if you are comparing CAR to STL. CAR had Cam Newton as QB. You have Sam Bradford. Not only can Cam run, but he is a better passer than Sam too. Cam opens the game up because the defense has to respect him. Cam has Steve Smith, a legitimate WR who can catch a ball. Cam has DWill and Tolbert as a two-man rushing attack. STL has a better Dexter McCluster and Zac Stacy. You are clueless for using the CAR game, the low-point of the NYG season, and comparing that to what the Rams have. Once again, know what you are talking about, k?
|
|
|
Post by plax on Feb 9, 2014 23:09:20 GMT -5
plaxKNOW YOUR OWN FACTS! JAMAAL CHARLES HAD 3.6 YPC AGAINST THE GIANTS!! Yeah. But if you add up the YPC of all those guys combined, it averages under 3. Weird he'd include Charles, as it raises the actual average, but it just adds a big name to the list. I yelled at plax about this mid-season. Charles is a career 5+ ypc guy, so 3.6avr is a good thing to have Charles run against you. Every team will take a 3.6 running average against.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 9, 2014 23:10:33 GMT -5
Yeah. But if you add up the YPC of all those guys combined, it averages under 3. Weird he'd include Charles, as it raises the actual average, but it just adds a big name to the list. I yelled at plax about this mid-season. Charles is a career 5+ ypc guy, so 3.6avr is a good thing to have Charles run against you. Every team will take a 3.6 running average against. Holding Charles to 3.6 is a good day for a defense. But I yelled at you because your stat implies you held him to under 3. Keyword, implies.
|
|
|
Post by plax on Feb 9, 2014 23:10:41 GMT -5
Home: Denver Broncos - We are going to lose one of these, and I want to put W here, but I'll call it a tie to wuss out. Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - W New England Patriots - L New York Jets - W Tennessee Titans - W St. Louis Rams - W Seattle Seahawks - L Away: Denver Broncos - L Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - L Buffalo Bills - W Miami Dolphins - W Pittsburgh Steelers - L Arizona Cardinals - W San Francisco 49ers - L Officially guessing 9-6-1, but I guess 9-7. Man I already hate out schedule. We'll have to go 4-2 or 5-1 in Division to make the playoffs I bet. 101mitch What do you think? Wow, way to be over-generous. The Chiefs will lose to the Broncos twice, the Cardinals, the Seahawks, the 49ers, once or twice to the Chargers, and then lose 1-2 more that they probably shouldn't. 6-10 to 9-7 at best. you have the gaul to call out respectable predictions when you have your team going 11-5 with a bunch of "easy wins"?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2014 23:14:27 GMT -5
And, your point is? The Giants may have stopped some of the more premier rushers, but that's because all they did was focus on them, and as a result got picked apart in the passing game. You know what game really set the tone for the Giants to focus on stopping the run? Week 3. 0-38. 200 yds rushing. The Giants won't be able to do that with the Rams, because just like every other team the Giants tried to do that to, they then got torched in the air. The Rams-Giants game will be eerily reminiscent of that wk3 game this year. We got picked apart? Smith didn't pick up apart. Freeman did not pick us apart. Cutler was able to hit Marshall for big gains, but Jeffrey was held in check from what I can remember, as was Bennett. And you are using wk3 as your benchmark for the Giants? That was their low-point. You might not even know, but the Giants finished the year 7-3. Beason changed the entire culture of the defense. And you bring up wk3 as if you are comparing CAR to STL. CAR had Cam Newton as QB. You have Sam Bradford. Not only can Cam run, but he is a better passer than Sam too. Cam opens the game up because the defense has to respect him. Cam has Steve Smith, a legitimate WR who can catch a ball. Cam has DWill and Tolbert as a two-man rushing attack. STL has a better Dexter McCluster and Zac Stacy. You are clueless for using the CAR game, the low-point of the NYG season, and comparing that to what the Rams have. Once again, know what you are talking about, k? Really? Fine. I won't use Carolina as an example of what the Rams will do to the Giants. I have a better example. Week 15. I am sure this is clear in your memory. Ah, once again, another shutout (something that seems to be a recurring theme recently in NYG) You know what? Lynch didn't even run that good. He had 16 carries for 47 yards. What defeats the Giants isn't necessarily the run game, but a stout D. Seattle and Carolina both boast top 5 D's. St. Louis was top 10 this past season, and now with Greg Williams, they are talented enough to be top 5. The Giants can't compete with top-notch defenses. Reason why?? Eli Manning. He threw a whopping SIX interceptions between those two games.
|
|