|
Post by plax on Feb 9, 2014 22:55:18 GMT -5
you have said that the past two years. I am not upset at all. I find it baffling that you are predicting 11 wins for a team that was supposed to be on the rise for years now, only to end up in the 6-8 win range. Not to mention that you are predicting a team record in February before FA, the draft, and injuries that will occur in pre-season. And LOL at you using BleacherReport to make some sort of point lol. Kind of funny though - for all the smack you talk about the Giants, we had the same record as you with half of our team being completely terrible. So the Giants at their worst are the Rams on average. I don't need to know about FA or the draft. Before either of those, the Rams would still defeat the subpar Giants. The only thing that I will admit to, is if there are any injuries prior to the game. The reason I am so cocky about this game in particular is because I know what Eli Manning is all about. Nicks is going to be gone, and Manning's only hope will be Cruz (who mind you, will be blanketed by Jenkins and perhaps a safety). Then you have to remember the best pass rush in the league, and then you have to remember how bad the Giants are at stopping the run and Zac Stacy. We will run all over the Giants and win by at least 14+ points. If you want to argue the Giants with me, know your stuff. The Giants were actually a very good run stopping team last year. They held AP, McCoy, Charles, and Forte to an average of less than 3 yards per carry. Once again, know your stuff "Mr. Cocky". Didn't think someone could even be cocky over their mediocre team. Because apparently you will have "easy wins", when nothing comes easy. Ask Eagle about the Giants/Eagles game where he said the same. Ask Denver when they played Jacksonville. "Subpar" Giants of 2013 = 7-9 Supposed-2014 Rams of 2013 = 7-9 Nicks will be gone? Maybe. Nicks barely did much this year, and with our new offensive system, we will be fine on offense again. You wouldn't know how much of a problem Gilbride was last year because you are clueless about the Giants - you just look at boxscores (which is funny bc you have no clue about the Giants run stopping defense). And Jernigan and Randle will also be big parts of the offense next year, and both will be very good.
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Feb 9, 2014 22:58:18 GMT -5
plaxKNOW YOUR OWN FACTS! JAMAAL CHARLES HAD 3.6 YPC AGAINST THE GIANTS!!
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Feb 9, 2014 22:58:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 9, 2014 23:00:14 GMT -5
Home: Denver Broncos - We are going to lose one of these, and I want to put W here, but I'll call it a tie to wuss out. Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - W New England Patriots - L New York Jets - W Tennessee Titans - W St. Louis Rams - W Seattle Seahawks - L Away: Denver Broncos - L Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - L Buffalo Bills - W Miami Dolphins - W Pittsburgh Steelers - L Arizona Cardinals - W San Francisco 49ers - L Officially guessing 9-6-1, but I guess 9-7. Man I already hate out schedule. We'll have to go 4-2 or 5-1 in Division to make the playoffs I bet. 101mitch What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by plax on Feb 9, 2014 23:00:33 GMT -5
plaxKNOW YOUR OWN FACTS! JAMAAL CHARLES HAD 3.6 YPC AGAINST THE GIANTS!! the combined carries and yards for them were less than 3. i think you said the same thing last time when I brought that stat up lol.
|
|
|
Post by cityofchamps on Feb 9, 2014 23:01:16 GMT -5
Steelers 2014 Opponents
Home Bengals - W Ravens - W Browns - W Texans - W/L Colts - W/L Saints - W/L Buccaneers - W Chiefs - W/L
Away
Bengals - W/L Ravens - W/L Browns - W Jaguars - W Titans - W/L Falcons - W/L Panthers - W/L Jets - W
W - Most likely should win W/L - Equal chance of winning or losing
With that said, our record could be as low as 7-9, but realistically I see us going 10-6/11-5 based on the way we played towards the end of last season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2014 23:01:36 GMT -5
I don't need to know about FA or the draft. Before either of those, the Rams would still defeat the subpar Giants. The only thing that I will admit to, is if there are any injuries prior to the game. The reason I am so cocky about this game in particular is because I know what Eli Manning is all about. Nicks is going to be gone, and Manning's only hope will be Cruz (who mind you, will be blanketed by Jenkins and perhaps a safety). Then you have to remember the best pass rush in the league, and then you have to remember how bad the Giants are at stopping the run and Zac Stacy. We will run all over the Giants and win by at least 14+ points. If you want to argue the Giants with me, know your stuff. The Giants were actually a very good run stopping team last year. They held AP, McCoy, Charles, and Forte to an average of less than 3 yards per carry. Once again, know your stuff "Mr. Cocky". Didn't think someone could even be cocky over their mediocre team. Because apparently you will have "easy wins", when nothing comes easy. Ask Eagle about the Giants/Eagles game where he said the same. Ask Denver when they played Jacksonville. "Subpar" Giants of 2013 = 7-9 Supposed-2014 Rams of 2013 = 7-9 Nicks will be gone? Maybe. Nicks barely did much this year, and with our new offensive system, we will be fine on offense again. You wouldn't know how much of a problem Gilbride was last year because you are clueless about the Giants - you just look at boxscores (which is funny bc you have no clue about the Giants run stopping defense). And Jernigan and Randle will also be big parts of the offense next year, and both will be very good. And, your point is? The Giants may have stopped some of the more premier rushers, but that's because all they did was focus on them, and as a result got picked apart in the passing game. You know what game really set the tone for the Giants to focus on stopping the run? Week 3. 0-38. 200 yds rushing. The Giants won't be able to do that with the Rams, because just like every other team the Giants tried to do that to, they then got torched in the air. The Rams-Giants game will be eerily reminiscent of that wk3 game this year.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 9, 2014 23:01:55 GMT -5
plaxKNOW YOUR OWN FACTS! JAMAAL CHARLES HAD 3.6 YPC AGAINST THE GIANTS!! Yeah. But if you add up the YPC of all those guys combined, it averages under 3. Weird he'd include Charles, as it raises the actual average, but it just adds a big name to the list. I yelled at plax about this mid-season.
|
|
|
Post by Morkim on Feb 9, 2014 23:02:13 GMT -5
plaxKNOW YOUR OWN FACTS! JAMAAL CHARLES HAD 3.6 YPC AGAINST THE GIANTS!! the combined carries and yards for them were less than 3. i think you said the same thing last time when I brought that stat up lol. That was me.
|
|
|
Post by 101mitch on Feb 9, 2014 23:04:07 GMT -5
Wow.. This schedule sucks.
Home:
Denver Broncos - W! Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - W New England Patriots - L New York Jets - W Tennessee Titans - W St. Louis Rams - W Seattle Seahawks - L
Away:
Denver Broncos - L Oakland Raiders - W San Diego Chargers - L Buffalo Bills - W Miami Dolphins - W Pittsburgh Steelers - W Arizona Cardinals - L San Francisco 49ers - L
10-6. Official guess 9-7. We'll drop one of the W's I have. I think we'll snag a WC, but lose as usual. Of course this all depends on FA and Draft
|
|